Legal Compliance100/100
The use of a DPS is a valid procurement procedure. However, the absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, specific selection criteria, and evaluation criteria in the provided extract raises significant concerns regarding transparency and adherence to public procurement principles.
•No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided tender information.
•Missing evaluation criteria.
Clarity40/100
While the high-level description of the DPS purpose is clear, the complete absence of any tender documents or detailed requirements makes it impossible for potential bidders to understand the full scope, specific criteria, and the precise submission process.
•No documents attached, No document content available.
•Missing evaluation criteria.
Completeness83/100
This is the tender's weakest point. The provided information is severely incomplete, lacking all essential tender documents, detailed selection and award criteria, specific financial requirements, and comprehensive technical specifications.
•No documents attached, No document content available.
•Missing evaluation criteria.
Fairness60/100
The complete lack of detailed, publicly available criteria (exclusion, selection, evaluation) creates a significant risk of unfairness and lack of transparency. Without these specifics, it is impossible to ensure all potential suppliers are assessed on an equal and objective footing.
•Missing evaluation criteria.
•No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided tender information.
Practicality40/100
For potential bidders, the tender as presented is highly impractical due to the complete absence of supporting documents. It is impossible to prepare a compliant and competitive submission without access to the full tender pack.
•No documents attached, No document content available.
Data Consistency100/100
The basic information provided (title, reference, organization, value, duration) is internally consistent. However, the lack of detailed content means there is little data to cross-reference for broader consistency checks.
Sustainability0/100
There is no mention of green procurement, social criteria, or innovation focus in the provided information, indicating a complete absence of sustainability considerations within the outlined tender characteristics.
•Not green procurement, No social criteria, No innovation focus.