Latgale, Latvia
€16,500
February 17, 2026 at 13:00
Other
164680
For detailed contact information, please refer to the official procurement documents.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
This tender provides a clear description and detailed requirements for a standard service, but the critical issue of "Restricted document access" significantly undermines its legal compliance, completeness, and fairness. There are also inconsistencies regarding e-submission and a complete lack of sustainability considerations.
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly, and the submission period is reasonable. However, the "Restricted document access" is a significant concern regarding transparency and compliance with public procurement principles. While evaluation criteria are specified in detailed documents, the lack of full access is a major flaw.
The tender's description is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements are well-defined. The division into 8 parts with specific requirements and the presence of technical specifications contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the scope of work and evaluation criteria (lowest price).
Basic information, financial details, timeline, and location are all provided. Requirements and criteria are defined across the various documents. However, the "Restricted document access" fundamentally compromises the completeness of the tender from a bidder's perspective, as essential information may not be fully available.
The tender's fairness is severely impacted by the "Restricted document access," which prevents equal and transparent access to all necessary information for potential bidders. While evaluation criteria are objective (lowest price) and requirements appear generic, this access restriction is a critical barrier to fair competition. The contradiction regarding e-submission also raises concerns.
The tender specifies a clear contract duration. However, the contradiction between "E-Procurement" as a characteristic and the "No e-submission" flag creates uncertainty regarding the practical submission process. A specific contract start date is not provided, and the "Restricted document access" also impacts the practicality of obtaining tender documents.
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. The primary inconsistency lies in the contradiction between "E-Procurement" being listed as a characteristic and the automated check flagging "No e-submission."
The tender does not include any specific criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Ask me anything about this tender
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required
Setup in 2 minutes