Acquisition of medical technologies for the Resuscitation and Operating Block of SIA “Daugavpils Regional Hospital”

This tender is well-structured and EU-funded, but its transparency and fairness are significantly undermined by restricted document access and contradictions regarding e-submission.

The tender defines an open procedure, uses an appropriate CPV code, and has a reasonable submission deadline. However, the 'Restricted document access' and the lack of extracted content for the 'Nolikums' (a key regulatory document) are significant legal transparency issues.

The basic description and AI-extracted requirements are clear. Performance conditions refer to technical specifications. However, the contradiction between the AI-extracted evaluation criteria and the 'Missing evaluation criteria' flag creates ambiguity regarding the comprehensive clarity of evaluation methods.

Basic information, financial details, and timeline are well-populated. However, the 'Restricted document access' and the absence of content for the 'Nolikums' document represent significant gaps in the readily available tender documentation.

The disclosed value and reasonable deadlines are positive. However, 'Restricted document access' is a critical barrier to fair competition and transparency. The contradiction between 'E-Procurement' and 'No e-submission' also raises concerns about equal access, and the full transparency of evaluation criteria is questionable.

Contract duration and financing are clear. However, the contradiction between 'E-Procurement' and 'No e-submission' is a significant practical concern. The absence of a specific contract start date and an explicit document URL also slightly detracts from practicality.

Key fields are mostly populated, and dates are logical. However, there are significant contradictions regarding the presence of evaluation criteria, e-submission functionality, and the accessibility of documents, which severely impact data consistency.

Despite being EU funded, the tender explicitly lacks any stated green procurement, social, or innovation criteria, representing a missed opportunity for sustainable procurement practices.