Procurement of educational literature (printed textbooks and workbooks)

This tender for educational literature demonstrates good clarity and completeness in its documentation, including detailed requirements and evaluation criteria. However, significant concerns arise from restricted document access and a critical inconsistency in the tender timeline regarding the opening and submission dates.

The tender defines an open procedure, uses appropriate CPV codes, and specifies evaluation criteria (lowest price without VAT), aligning with basic legal requirements. It is also EU funded and WTO/GPA compliant. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a significant concern regarding transparency and equal treatment, which are fundamental principles of public procurement.

The tender's description is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive, covering all necessary aspects from exclusion grounds to submission procedures. The performance conditions clearly refer to the technical specification and draft contract, and evaluation criteria (lowest price) are explicitly stated in the document summaries.

All essential information, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, deadlines, duration, and location (NUTS code), is provided. The tender includes a comprehensive set of 11 documents, detailing technical specifications, financial offer forms, and a draft contract, indicating thorough documentation. While documents are listed, 'Restricted document access' could hinder effective completeness for bidders.

The tender discloses the estimated value and sets a reasonable deadline for submission. Evaluation criteria based on the lowest price are objective and transparent. E-procurement is indicated, promoting equal access. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a major impediment to fairness, potentially disadvantaging bidders who cannot access full documentation.

The tender indicates support for e-procurement and specifies a 12-month contract duration. Financing information (EU Funded, estimated value) is available. A significant practical drawback is the 'Restricted document access,' which creates a barrier for potential bidders. The lack of an explicit contract start date is a minor practical detail.

Most key fields are populated, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, a critical inconsistency exists in the timeline: the Opening Date (2026-02-24 00:00:00) is listed *before* the Submission Deadline (2026-02-24 09:00:00). This is a severe procedural flaw that undermines the integrity of the bidding process.

The tender is EU funded, which often implies adherence to higher standards. However, it explicitly lacks specific criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, indicating a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability principles.