Legal Compliance75/100
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes correctly, and there are no reported disputes. However, the absence of an explicit reveal date and specified mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided information are notable compliance gaps.
•Missing tender reveal date
•No specific mandatory exclusion grounds explicitly stated
Clarity80/100
The description of the required services and technical capabilities is clear and unambiguous. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly hinders the overall clarity of the procurement process for potential bidders.
•Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100
Basic information, financial details, duration, and key deadlines are provided. While service requirements are outlined, the explicit lack of evaluation criteria is a significant omission, making the tender incomplete in a crucial aspect.
•Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness55/100
The tender supports e-procurement and discloses the estimated value, which are positive for fairness. However, the critical absence of explicit evaluation criteria severely compromises the objectivity and transparency of the process, making it difficult for bidders to compete fairly.
•Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality90/100
The tender demonstrates good practicality by supporting electronic submission via a specified portal, providing a clear document URL, and detailing the contract start date, duration, and financing information.
Data Consistency80/100
Dates are logical and consistent, and no disputes are reported. However, minor inconsistencies exist with missing codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure', an empty 'Liable Person' field, and a slight discrepancy between the EUR estimated value and the GBP range.
•Missing codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure'
•Empty 'Liable Person' field
Sustainability20/100
The tender does not include any explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, indicating a lack of integration of sustainability considerations into the procurement process.
•No green procurement criteria
•No social criteria