Legal Compliance75/100
The tender defines the procedure type and provides a reasonable timeline for a below-threshold competition. However, the absence of specified mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements in the provided information, along with a failed document download, raises concerns about full compliance with national procurement regulations.
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds in AI-extracted requirements.
•Missing specific financial requirements in AI-extracted requirements.
Clarity80/100
The scope of works, technical requirements, and engagement instructions are clearly articulated. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major deficiency, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified.
Completeness70/100
Basic information, deadlines, value, duration, and location are well-defined. Nevertheless, critical elements such as mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and especially evaluation criteria are missing. The failure to download a key document further detracts from completeness.
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds.
•Missing specific financial requirements.
Fairness85/100
The tender supports e-procurement and provides reasonable time for preparation and site visits, and requirements do not appear tailored. However, the lack of transparent evaluation criteria significantly undermines fairness, as bidders cannot objectively understand the basis for award decisions. The failed document download also impacts equal access to information.
•No evaluation criteria specified, impacting transparency and objectivity.
•"Tender Notice" document failed to download, hindering full document access.
Practicality65/100
Electronic submission via the Jaggaer portal is clearly supported, and key dates like contract start and duration are provided. The process for arranging site visits is also clear. However, the failed download of a primary tender document presents a practical hurdle for interested parties.
•"Tender Notice" document failed to download.
Data Consistency90/100
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent within the provided timetable. The primary inconsistency lies in the estimated value, which is stated in EUR in the basic information but in GBP in one of the document summaries.
•Inconsistent estimated value currency (972,000.00 EUR vs. £810,000).
Sustainability50/100
The tender includes a positive green procurement aspect by specifying the replacement of lighting with LED fittings. However, it lacks explicit mention of broader social aspects or innovation focus, indicating a limited integration of comprehensive sustainability criteria.
•No explicit social criteria mentioned.
•No explicit innovation focus mentioned.