Legal Compliance100/100
Based solely on the provided summary, the tender lacks explicit mention of mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed financial requirements, which are standard components of legally compliant procurement processes. The absence of full tender documents makes a definitive assessment of legal compliance impossible.
•No mandatory exclusion grounds explicitly mentioned in the provided information.
•Absence of full tender documents (ITT, specifications, terms and conditions).
Clarity40/100
The description of services, contract duration, and reporting requirements are generally clear. However, there is an inconsistency regarding the exact contract duration (4 years vs. 55 months vs. 1-year extension option) that requires clarification.
•Inconsistency in stated contract duration (4 years, 55 months, 1-year extension option).
Completeness83/100
The tender information is critically incomplete due to the complete absence of attached documents and content, including essential evaluation criteria. This severely limits the ability of potential bidders to prepare comprehensive proposals and for analysts to fully assess the tender's quality.
•No documents attached or document content available.
•Missing evaluation criteria.
Fairness60/100
The lack of evaluation criteria makes it impossible to assess the fairness of the selection process. While the technical requirements appear reasonable, the specific mention of a 'surveyor-led multi-disciplinary team' could potentially limit competition if other valid team structures exist in the market, though it is a common model for these services.
•Missing evaluation criteria, preventing assessment of selection fairness.
•Requirement for a 'surveyor-led multi-disciplinary team' could be seen as slightly restrictive.
Practicality40/100
The scope of work, including condition surveys, design, and project management for a significant works programme, is practical and well-defined for the stated contract duration and estimated value. The requirement for a multi-disciplinary team is also practical for the services required.
Data Consistency100/100
A significant inconsistency exists between the stated 'Contract Duration: 55 months' and the description of 'a period of 4 years, with a 12 month break clause, and an option to extend by one year'. This needs immediate clarification.
•Inconsistency in contract duration (55 months vs. 4 years + 1-year option).
Sustainability0/100
The tender summary indicates a complete absence of green procurement, social criteria, or innovation focus, which is a missed opportunity to integrate broader public value objectives into the procurement process.
•No green procurement criteria.
•No social criteria.