Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Naturhusets inventar

Åben
Frist
16 dage tilbage
April 20, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Leverancer
Reference
305571
Værdi
€4,261,471
Lokation
Estonia, Estland
Udgivet
Februar 27, 2026
CPV-kode
Evalueringskriterier
TOTAL (Contract price)100%
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Februar 27, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 13, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 20, 2026

Åbning af udbud

Marts 30, 2026

VinderchancePRO
🔒
Opgrader til Professional
Se din estimerede vinderchance baseret på historiske data.
Opgrader til Professionel →
OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
SektorsindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for sektorsindsigt
Se gennemsnitlige vinderpriser, konkurrenceniveauer og markedstrends.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
€4,261,471
Varighed
Ikke angivet
Lokation
Estonia
Type
Leverancer
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God
Markedsbenchmark
Gns. Vindende Pris
€72,774
Gns. Tilbud
3.3
Konkurrence
Medium
SMV Vindere
93%
884 udbud analyseret

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Indkøb af inventar (løst og fastmonteret) samt tilhørende installationsarbejde til Naturhusets bygningskompleks.
Elektronisk Afsendelse

Kør risikoanalyse

Identificer potentielle risici, uoverensstemmelser og advarselstegn på tværs af alle udbudsdokumenter. Få en detaljeret risikorapport med alvorlighedsgrader og anbefalinger til afhjælpning.

Log ind

Vinderstrategi

AI-drevet analyse af dette udbuds krav, muligheder og udfordringer. Få strategiske indsigter for at maksimere din vinderchance.

65%
Estimeret vinderchanceModerat match

This tender for Loodusmaja furniture and installation is heavily price-driven, requiring a highly cost-competitive bid. While social and green procurement are not explicit requirements, demonstrating value through quality, durability, and efficient installation will be key differentiators. Focus on meticulous adherence to specifications and a streamlined submission process.

Nøglebudskaber til at vinde

Cost-Effective Quality: Delivering durable, safe, and compliant furniture solutions at the most competitive price point.

Seamless Execution: Ensuring efficient and professional installation services that meet RKAS's standards.

Reliable Partnership: Demonstrating a commitment to fulfilling all tender requirements with precision and timeliness.

Nøglemuligheder
Price-driven evaluation allows for significant advantage with a highly competitive offer.
Opportunity to leverage existing supplier relationships for cost efficiencies in sourcing materials.
The requirement for 'equivalent' standards allows for flexibility in product selection to optimize cost.
Nøgleudfordringer
Intense price competition due to the primary evaluation criterion being total contract cost.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, optimize supply chain, explore bulk discounts, and ensure efficient operational processes to present the lowest possible viable price.

Ensuring absolute compliance with all specified technical requirements and submission formats.

Implement a rigorous internal review process for all bid documents, including a checklist against each requirement and form. Engage technical experts to verify product compliance and installation plans.

Potential for ambiguity in 'equivalent' standards if not clearly defined by the bidder.

Proactively define and justify how proposed 'equivalent' products meet or exceed the specified standards for durability, safety, and suitability for office, museum, and archive environments.

Ideel tilbudsgiverprofil
A furniture supplier and installer with a proven track record in delivering high-volume, quality office and public building fit-outs. The ideal bidder possesses strong supply chain management, efficient installation capabilities, and a deep understanding of cost optimization without compromising on durability and safety standards. Experience with public sector procurement and Riigi Kinnisvara AS (RKAS) requirements is a significant advantage.
Nøglekrav
Compliance with detailed specifications for loose and fixed furniture (Part 1 & 2)
Accurate and complete submission of price tables and product descriptions in the prescribed format
Confirmation of agreement with contracting authority's conditions and bid compliance (Form 2)
Submission of unit prices for loose furniture (Form 3 Part 1)
Submission of price table for fixed furniture (Part 2)
Meeting standards for office buildings, museums, and archives (durability, safety)
Installation services
Adherence to submission deadline (2026-03-30 13:00:00)
Nøgledifferentiatorer
Demonstrated cost leadership through optimized supply chain and efficient operations.
Exceptional track record in delivering large-scale furniture projects on time and within budget.
Proactive and clear communication regarding product equivalency and installation methodology.
Muligheder for social værdi
While not a mandatory requirement, consider a commitment to local employment for installation teams, or sourcing materials from suppliers with strong ethical labor practices. This can be a subtle differentiator if competitors do not address it.
Fokusområder for tilbud
Total Contract CostMaximum Score for Lowest Price

Achieve the lowest possible price by optimizing sourcing, logistics, and installation efficiency. Conduct detailed cost breakdowns to identify areas for savings without compromising quality or compliance.

Technical ComplianceN/A (Implicitly Critical for Acceptance)

Meticulously review and address every item in 'Lisa 1.1_Sisustuse spetsifikatsioon_Osa 1' and 'Lisa 1.2_Loodusmaja_KOHTKINDEL SISUSTUS'. Ensure all proposed furniture meets or exceeds the specified standards for durability, safety, and suitability for the intended environments. Clearly articulate how 'equivalent' products meet these standards.

Submission Completeness and AccuracyN/A (Implicitly Critical for Acceptance)

Strict adherence to all submission requirements, including forms (Form 2, Form 3 Part 1, Form 8 if applicable), price tables, and product descriptions. Double-check all data entry for accuracy and ensure all required fields are completed.

Anbefalinger6
Master the Price Table and Product Specifications
KritiskHøj indsats

Dedicate significant resources to accurately populate Form 3 Part 1 and the Part 2 price table. Ensure product descriptions align perfectly with the technical specifications in 'Lisa 1.1' and 'Lisa 1.2'. Any discrepancies can lead to disqualification.

Ensures bid eligibility and maximizes score for the primary evaluation criterion.
Aggressively Price for Lowest Cost
KritiskHøj indsats

Given the price-driven evaluation, conduct a detailed cost-down exercise. Explore all avenues for supply chain optimization, bulk purchasing discounts, and efficient logistics to present the most competitive price possible.

Directly impacts the primary evaluation criterion and win probability.
Thoroughly Document 'Equivalent' Product Justification
HøjMedium indsats

For any product offered as an 'equivalent', prepare clear, concise documentation demonstrating how it meets or exceeds the specified standards for durability, safety, and suitability for office, museum, and archive environments. This preempts potential queries from the contracting authority.

Reduces risk of technical non-compliance and potential disqualification.
Rigorous Bid Review and Quality Assurance
HøjMedium indsats

Implement a multi-stage internal review process for the entire bid submission. This should include checks for completeness, accuracy, compliance with all requirements, and adherence to formatting instructions.

Minimizes errors and omissions that could lead to disqualification.
Highlight Installation Expertise and Efficiency
MediumLav indsats

While price is paramount, emphasize the bidder's proven capability for efficient and professional installation. Detail the process, team qualifications, and any quality control measures to assure RKAS of a smooth project execution.

Adds value beyond price, potentially influencing subjective aspects of evaluation if any exist, and builds confidence.
Consider Local Employment Commitment
LavLav indsats

If feasible, include a commitment to utilizing local labor for installation services. This can be a subtle positive differentiator without significantly impacting costs.

Enhances social value perception, potentially a minor positive factor.
Konkurrencemæssig positionering
Position as the most cost-effective provider of high-quality, durable, and safe furniture solutions, backed by efficient installation services. Emphasize a streamlined, error-free submission process to instill confidence in the bidder's professionalism and attention to detail.

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

19 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (4)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (7)
Teknisk (6)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bids must be submitted in accordance with the instructions for submission, formatting, and deadline.
--The bid must refer to the technical specification and contract conditions.
--The bid must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-03-30 13:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--References to standards or other bases must be read as "or equivalent".
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Bidders must submit a bid that complies with the contracting authority's conditions.
--Bidders must submit a separation of trade secrets.
--Bidders must submit price tables and product descriptions in the prescribed format.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--The contracting authority is looking for a partner to furnish the nature house in Tallinn.
--New, durable, and safe furniture items are required.
--Installation services are required.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid evaluation criteria focus primarily on the total contract cost, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

13 dokumenter tilgængelige med AI-resuméer

VastavustingimusedPDF
305571_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 23.6 KB

Bidders must submit a bid that complies with the contracting authority's conditions, distinguishing trade secrets, and providing form-compliant price tables and product descriptions.

Vis
Lisa 1.1_Sisustuse spetsifikatsioon_Osa 1XLS
Lisa 11_Sisustuse spetsifikatsioon_Osa 1.xlsx -- 20.6 MB

This document outlines detailed technical specifications and requirements for the design and offering of furniture (Part 1 – Loose furniture) for the Nature House, where the bidder must fill in the white and red marked fields in the table.

Vis
Vorm 2DOC
Vorm 2.docx -- 17.8 KB

This form is an application for participation in the tender procedure, confirming acceptance of terms and compliance of the bid with requirements.

Vis
Vorm 3_Osa 1XLS
Vorm 3_Osa 1.xlsx -- 30.7 KB

The bidder must complete Form 3 Part 1 by providing unit prices for loose furniture, such as sofas and tables, according to the requirements of the contracting authority Riigi Kinnisvara AS.

Vis
Vorm 3_Osa 2XLS
Vorm 3_Osa 2.xlsx -- 32.8 KB

The bidder must submit a price table for fixed furnishings (kitchens, break areas) in Part 2, including unit prices and quantities.

Vis
Vorm 8DOC
Vorm 8.docx -- 13.7 KB

This document is a joint bid authorization, empowering one bidder to act on behalf of others in the tender procedure.

Vis
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305571_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.4 KB

The tender evaluation criteria primarily focus on the total contract cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Vis
Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305571_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 81.3 KB

The tender pass explains the use of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), which serves as preliminary evidence of a company's qualifications and compliance with tender conditions, but this document itself is for familiarization with the conditions, not for completion.

Vis
Lisa 1.1_Sisustuse spetsifikatsioon_Osa 2XLS
Lisa 11_Sisustuse spetsifikatsioon_Osa 2.xlsx -- 22.9 KB

This document details the fixed furniture requirements for the Nature House tender, including specifications for kitchens and break areas.

Vis
Lisa 1_Tehniline kirjeldus_Osa 1DOC
Lisa 1_Tehniline kirjeldus_Osa 1.docx -- 40.3 KB

The contracting authority seeks a partner to furnish a nature house in Tallinn, requiring new, durable, and safe furniture items and installation services.

Vis
Lisa 1_Tehniline kirjeldus_Osa 2DOC
Lisa 1_Tehniline kirjeldus_Osa 2.docx -- 39.6 KB

The contracting authority seeks a supplier and installer for the interior furnishing of a nature house in Tallinn, requiring new, durable, and safe furniture and equipment that meet standards for office buildings, museums, and archives.

Vis
Lisa 2_Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2_Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 47.1 KB

This document is a draft contract that outlines the terms and legal framework for the sales agreement related to the Nature House furnishing public procurement.

Vis
Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekDOC
Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek.docx -- 43.5 KB

This document provides instructions for bid submission, formatting, and deadlines, along with references to the technical specification and contract conditions.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning af Dokumenter

Tilmeld dig for at se dokumentresuméer og analyser

75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for nature house furnishing is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria beyond price and has limited sustainability considerations.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender adheres to most legal compliance aspects, including a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and regulatory compliance. Deadlines are reasonable. The absence of explicit dispute information is positive. The 'or equivalent' clause for standards is a good practice.

Klarhed80/100

The description of the required furnishing and installation services is clear. Requirements are documented through various technical specifications and forms. The 'or equivalent' clause enhances clarity. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria beyond price could be improved.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria beyond price.
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, deadlines, and duration (tender validity). Key documents like technical specifications and submission forms are provided. However, the contract duration is not specified, impacting overall completeness.

Contract duration is not specified.
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender offers full document access and discloses the estimated value. Deadlines are reasonable, and the use of e-procurement and e-submission promotes fairness. Criteria are objective, focusing on price, though more detailed evaluation criteria would be beneficial. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are mandated, which is practical. Document URLs are implicitly available through the e-procurement portal. However, the contract start date is stated as 'presumptive' and not legally binding, and financing information is absent, reducing practicality.

Contract start date is presumptive and not legally binding.
Financing information is absent.
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and estimated value are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. The tender validity period is consistent with typical procurement timelines.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, indicating some consideration for sustainability. However, there are no specific social aspects or innovation focuses detailed within the provided information, and it is not explicitly stated as EU funded.

Lack of specific social aspects or innovation focus.
Not explicitly stated as EU funded.

Styrker

Clear technical specifications and submission forms.
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
Reasonable deadlines and clear procedure.
Inclusion of 'or equivalent' clause for standards.

Bekymringer

Missing explicit evaluation criteria beyond price.
Contract duration not specified.
Presumptive contract start date.

Anbefalinger

1. Specify detailed evaluation criteria beyond price.
2. Clarify the contract duration.
3. Provide more specific details on sustainability aspects (social, innovation).

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline