Undersøgelse af årsager og tendenser til tilbagevendende vold i hjemmet

This tender seeks research on domestic violence recurrence. The strategy focuses on demonstrating deep expertise in social research, a victim-centric approach, and a clear, actionable research methodology. Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria, a strong emphasis on the quality and relevance of the proposed research plan will be paramount.

Expertise in sensitive social research, delivering actionable insights into domestic violence recurrence.

A victim-centric, ethical, and methodologically sound approach to understanding complex social trends.

Commitment to producing high-quality, policy-relevant research that informs effective interventions.

Develop a detailed, step-by-step research plan that clearly outlines qualitative and quantitative methods, sampling strategies, data collection techniques (e.g., in-depth interviews, surveys), and analytical frameworks. Emphasize ethical considerations, victim safety, and data privacy throughout. Showcase how the methodology directly addresses the 'causes and trends of recurrence from the victim's perspective'.

Highlight the qualifications and relevant experience of the research team, particularly their expertise in domestic violence, social research, qualitative methods, and working with vulnerable groups. Include CVs of key personnel and provide examples of previous relevant research projects and publications.

Demonstrate a deep understanding of the complexities of domestic violence, its cyclical nature, and the specific challenges faced by victims in Lithuania. Reference existing literature and policy frameworks to show informed perspective.

Clearly define the expected outputs, including interim reports (if applicable) and the final comprehensive research report. Outline the structure and content of the final report, emphasizing its policy relevance and actionable recommendations.

Given the sensitive nature of domestic violence, a comprehensive ethical framework is paramount. This should include detailed protocols for informed consent, data anonymization, victim confidentiality, researcher training in trauma-informed approaches, and protocols for managing disclosures of ongoing harm. Explicitly state how these will be implemented.

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, infer them from the tender title, description, and supporting documents. Focus on demonstrating methodological rigor, ethical integrity, team expertise, and the potential for actionable insights. Structure the bid to highlight these inferred priorities.

Emphasize a research approach that prioritizes the well-being and voice of victims. This could involve flexible interview schedules, accessible communication methods, and a clear commitment to avoiding re-traumatization. Detail how the research will empower victims' narratives.

Go beyond generic CVs. For each key team member, explicitly link their past research experience, publications, and training to the specific requirements of this tender, particularly in domestic violence, qualitative research, and working with vulnerable populations.

Offer to share anonymized findings and a summary report with relevant Lithuanian NGOs and support organizations working with victims of domestic violence. This adds value beyond the direct contract and demonstrates a commitment to societal impact.

Outline specific technical and procedural measures for data storage, access control, and destruction to ensure the highest level of data security and confidentiality, in line with GDPR and Lithuanian data protection laws.

Create a logical, phased research plan that clearly outlines objectives, activities, timelines, and deliverables for each phase of the 7-month duration. This demonstrates project management capability and a realistic approach.

This tender for a research study on domestic violence recurrence is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and mandatory/eligibility requirements, impacting clarity and completeness.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear procedure type. The estimated value is disclosed and not over any sum limits. The provided timeline for submission and opening is clear. No disputes are indicated.

The title and description of the research topic are clear. Several key documents like contract drafts and procurement conditions are provided. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed mandatory/eligibility requirements reduces overall clarity.

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. Key documents like contract drafts and procurement conditions are attached. However, the lack of detailed requirements in several categories (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) leaves gaps.

The tender is open and uses e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The estimated value is disclosed, and the deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. The criteria for evaluation are not explicitly stated, which could be a concern for fairness if not detailed in the attached documents.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the 'Checks' section indicates 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'Procurement Characteristics'. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is absent.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided (submission, opening) are logical.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded.