Clewer Green Toiletter

This tender for 'Clewer Green Toilets' is a moderately detailed open competition for construction work with a clear scope. While generally well-structured, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and accessible tender documents, impacting overall quality.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear procedure (open competition below threshold) and a proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the absence of explicit evaluation criteria, which can be a legal compliance issue in some jurisdictions.

The description of the works is highly detailed, specifying quantities and types of materials and tasks for each trade. Requirements are well-documented within the description. Conditions are implicitly clear through the detailed scope of work.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date. However, the crucial tender documents are not accessible or summarized, significantly impacting completeness. The lack of explicit evaluation criteria also detracts from completeness.

The tender is an open competition, promoting fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for eligibility and technical capability are implicitly defined by the detailed scope of work. The encouragement of site visits is a positive aspect. The lack of accessible tender documents and explicit evaluation criteria slightly reduces fairness.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, it lacks information on financing and does not explicitly mention e-submission, which is a significant drawback for practicality in modern procurement. The encouragement of organised visits is a practical consideration.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. The timeline is logical, with a submission deadline preceding the contract start date. There are no indications of suspension or disputes.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This lack of focus on sustainability aspects results in a moderate score.