Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Ny skole, Indre Ringvej - Totalentrepriseudbud

Åben
Frist
9 dage tilbage
April 13, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Andet
Reference
00170483-2026
Værdi
Ikke oplyst
Lokation
Syddanmark, Denmark
Udgivet
Marts 27, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 11, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 06, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 13, 2026

Budget
Ikke oplyst
Varighed
Ikke angivet
Lokation
Syddanmark
Type
Andet
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Udbuddet gennemføres som et udbud med forhandling iht. Udbudslovens §§ 61-66 med en forudgående prækvalifikation. Ordregiver forbeholder sig ret til ikke at gennemføre en forhandling og således tildele kontrakten på baggrund af det indledende tilbud Tildelingskriteriet er ”Det bedste forhold mellem pris og kvalitet” iht. udbudslovens § 162, nr. 3. Blandt ansøgerne til prækvalifikationen udvælges fire teams, som inviteres til at afgive tilbud. Tilbudsfasen indledes med en fælles besigtigelse af d

Kør risikoanalyse

Identificer potentielle risici, uoverensstemmelser og advarselstegn på tværs af alle udbudsdokumenter. Få en detaljeret risikorapport med alvorlighedsgrader og anbefalinger til afhjælpning.

Log ind

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

19 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (9)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (2)
Teknisk (6)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--The tender is conducted as a negotiated procedure with prior pre-qualification, according to the Public Procurement Act §§ 61-66.
--The contracting authority reserves the right not to conduct negotiations and to award the contract based on the initial tender.
--The award criterion is "The best ratio between price and quality" according to the Public Procurement Act § 162, no. 3.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds mentioned in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Must be selected from applicants to the pre-qualification stage.
--Four teams will be selected to submit tenders.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Bidders will be invited to a voluntary dialogue meeting to discuss the intended architectural approach of their tender.
--The dialogue meeting aims to clarify questions and provide an updated understanding of architectural frameworks and intentions.
--The contracting authority will not evaluate qualitative sub-criteria before, during, or after the dialogue meeting.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements mentioned in the provided text.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender is a well-structured open procedure with pre-qualification, focusing on price-quality ratio. Key information is present, but financial details and specific evaluation criteria are missing, impacting completeness and clarity.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender follows a recognized legal procedure (negotiated procedure with pre-qualification) and specifies the relevant legal basis. The CPV code is appropriate. No disputes are indicated. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered short by some standards, but not critically so given the procedure type.

Klarhed80/100

The description of the procedure, including the pre-qualification, negotiation phases, and the award criterion ('best ratio between price and quality'), is generally clear. However, the specific sub-criteria for evaluating 'price and quality' are not detailed, which could lead to ambiguity for bidders.

Missing specific evaluation criteria for 'price and quality'.
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and CPV. The estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While documents are available, their content is not accessible in the provided data, and contract duration is not specified.

Estimated value not disclosed.
Contract duration not specified.
Retfærdighed85/100

The procedure is open, and the award criterion is objective ('best ratio between price and quality'). The use of e-procurement is noted. The selection of four teams for tender submission is a standard practice. No requirements appear to be tailored to specific companies.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

E-submission is indicated via a project website. However, the contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent. The availability of document content is crucial for practical submission, which is currently lacking.

Missing contract start date.
Financing information not provided.
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logical within the context of the tender publication and deadline.

Bæredygtighed50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding within the provided text, suggesting a lack of focus on these areas.

No mention of green procurement.
No mention of social aspects.

Styrker

Clear procedure outlined (negotiated with pre-qualification).
Objective award criterion ('price and quality').
E-procurement utilized.
Reference number and organization clearly stated.

Bekymringer

Estimated value not disclosed.
Specific evaluation sub-criteria are missing.
Content of tender documents not accessible.
Lack of sustainability considerations.

Anbefalinger

1. Disclose the estimated contract value.
2. Provide detailed sub-criteria for the 'price and quality' evaluation.
3. Include information on sustainability aspects if applicable.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline