Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

TD2317 - Forvaltning af Derby City Council Fritidscentre

Åben
Frist
362 dage tilbage
Marts 31, 2027
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Restricted Procedure
Reference
002024-2026
Værdi
£98,400,000
Lokation
Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 27, 2026
Organisation
Derby City Council
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Januar 09, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

Marts 24, 2027

Frist for tilbud

Marts 31, 2027

Kontraktens startdato

Marts 31, 2027

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Vis original
Budget
£98,400,000
Varighed
120 måneder
Lokation
Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire
Type
Restricted Procedure
68
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Myndigheden foretager et udbud for "Forvaltning af Derby City Council Fritidscentre". Kontraktens omfang vil omfatte forvaltning af: - Derby Arena (inklusive Café 42) - Springwood Leisure Centre. Dette udbud er ikke opdelt i partier. Rådet anser ikke, at en opdeling i partier ville være hensigtsmæssig, da dette kunne risikere at gøre udførelsen af Kontrakten overdrevent teknisk vanskelig eller dyr, og behovet for at koordinere forskellige operatører for partierne kunne alvorligt risikere at underminere Kontraktens korrekte udførelse og opnåelse af Tjenesternes resultater. Formålet med udbuddet vil være at sikre det mest fordelagtige tilbud under hensyntagen til Myndighedens strategiske resultater, samtidig med at betalingen til Myndigheden maksimeres. Ved at foretage dette udbud ønsker Myndigheden at opnå følgende resultater: • Etablere et langsigtet partnerskab med en erfaren operatør • Finansiel stabilitet for centrene gennem reducerede omkostninger og øget indkomst på grund af en mere kommerciel tilgang • Kapitalinvesteringer fra Operatøren til efterslæb af vedligeholdelse og fremtidige arbejder på faciliteterne • Planlagte og finansierede livscyklusinvesteringer, givet faciliteternes alder og fremtidige krav • Øget deltagelse i centrene • Øget deltagelse fra de borgere, der normalt er mindre tilbøjelige til at bruge et fritidscenter • Fremme af forbedret trivsel for borgerne • Positiv indvirkning på reduktion af fysisk aktivitet og sundhedsmæssig ulighed i byen • Maksimer Derby Arenas primære fokus som et regionalt, nationalt og internationalt idrætssted, der understøtter byens sportslige ambitioner. Det forventes, at Kontrakten vil påbegyndes i april 2027. Den estimerede værdi af kontrakten over den maksimale 20-årige periode er mellem £82 mio. - £98,4 mio. Dette er beregnet ud fra den samlede omsætning, som Operatøren forventes at generere på Fritidscentrene over den maksimale 20-årige periode.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

23 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (4)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (3)
Teknisk (10)
Finansiel (5)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--The tender must be submitted by the deadline of 2027-03-31 23:00:00.
--The tender must be the "most advantageous" considering the Authority's strategic outcomes.
--The tender must aim to maximise payment to the Authority.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are explicitly stated in the provided tender information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The bidder must be an experienced operator.
--The bidder must be capable of establishing a long-term partnership (up to 20 years).
--The bidder must be a legal entity capable of managing leisure centres.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS10
--The bidder must be capable of managing Derby Arena, including Café 42.
--The bidder must be capable of managing Springwood Leisure Centre.
--The bidder must demonstrate a commercial approach to achieve financial stability for the centres.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS5
--The bidder's tender must maximise the payment to the Authority.
--The bidder must demonstrate how they will achieve financial stability for the Centres through reduced costs and increased income.
--The bidder must commit to providing capital investment for backlog maintenance and future works.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

1 dokumenter tilgængelige med AI-resuméer

Official PDF VersionPDF
002024-2026_official.pdf

This tender seeks an experienced operator for a long-term partnership (up to 20 years, valued £82m-£98.4m) to manage Derby City Council's Leisure Centres, focusing on financial stability, capital investment, and increased community participation.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning af Dokumenter

Tilmeld dig for at se dokumentresuméer og analyser

68
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender outlines clear strategic objectives for leisure centre management but suffers from critical omissions in documentation and significant inconsistencies in contract duration, severely impacting its quality and fairness.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning100/100

The tender uses a recognized procedure ('Restricted', 'Competitive flexible procedure') but lacks explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, which are typically a legal requirement. The major inconsistency regarding contract duration (10 vs. 20 years) also raises significant legal transparency concerns.

•Absence of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds.
•Major inconsistency in stated contract duration (120 months vs. 'maximum 20 year term').
Klarhed40/100

While the strategic objectives and scope are clearly articulated, many 'extracted requirements' are high-level and lack specific metrics or detailed expectations, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be evaluated. The contract duration inconsistency is a fundamental clarity issue.

•Vague and high-level technical and financial requirements without specific metrics.
•Contradictory information regarding the contract duration (10 years vs. 20 years).
Fuldstændighed83/100

The tender information provided is severely incomplete. The absence of any attached documents, detailed specifications, terms and conditions, and crucially, evaluation criteria, means bidders cannot prepare a comprehensive or compliant submission.

•No tender documents attached or available for bidders.
•Missing explicit evaluation criteria and weightings.
Retfærdighed60/100

The requirement for significant capital investment by the operator, combined with a potentially very long contract term (up to 20 years), could significantly limit competition to a small number of very large, financially robust operators. The lack of evaluation criteria further undermines fairness by preventing transparent assessment of bids.

•Significant capital investment requirement may unduly restrict competition to a limited number of large operators.
•Lack of clear evaluation criteria hinders fair and objective assessment of tenders.
Praktisk anvendelighed40/100

From a bidder's perspective, the tender is highly impractical due to the complete absence of supporting documents and evaluation criteria. It is impossible to prepare a meaningful bid based solely on the provided summary. For the Authority, the 'competitive flexible procedure' offers flexibility, but without clear rules, it risks administrative burden and challenges.

•Impractical for bidders to prepare a comprehensive tender without any supporting documents or evaluation criteria.
Datakonsistens100/100

There is a critical inconsistency regarding the contract duration. The 'Timeline' states 120 months (10 years), while the 'Description' repeatedly refers to a 'maximum 20 year term' and bases the estimated value on this longer duration. This fundamental discrepancy impacts financial planning and risk assessment.

•Major contradiction between the stated 'Contract Duration: 120 months' and the 'Description' referring to a 'maximum 20 year term' for value estimation and partnership.
Bæredygtighed25/100

The tender explicitly incorporates 'Social Criteria' and outlines strong social outcomes related to participation, wellbeing, and reducing health inequality, which is a significant strength. However, there is no mention of environmental sustainability aspects.

•Lack of explicit environmental sustainability requirements (e.g., energy efficiency, waste management).

Styrker

Clear articulation of strategic objectives and desired social outcomes.
Emphasis on establishing a long-term partnership and operator-led capital investment.
Transparent estimated contract value (despite duration inconsistency).
Inclusion of 'Social Criteria' focusing on community wellbeing and participation.
Detailed description of the scope of services covering specific leisure centres.

Bekymringer

Critical absence of tender documents, detailed specifications, and evaluation criteria.
Major inconsistency in contract duration (10 years vs. 20 years) affecting financial planning.
Vague and high-level requirements that lack specific metrics for objective assessment.
Significant capital investment requirement potentially limiting competition.
Absence of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds.

Anbefalinger

1. Immediately publish comprehensive tender documents, including detailed specifications, terms and conditions, and clear evaluation criteria with weightings.
2. Clarify and correct the contract duration inconsistency, ensuring all related financial estimates and partnership terms align.
3. Elaborate on technical and financial requirements with specific, measurable criteria and expected outcomes to ensure fair and objective evaluation.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline