Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Trærisikoinspektioner og forvaltningsplaner

Åben
Frist
17 dage tilbage
April 21, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Andet
Reference
022003-2026
Værdi
Ikke oplyst
Lokation
Greater Manchester, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 27, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 11, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 14, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 21, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

September 30, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
Ikke oplyst
Varighed
12 måneder
Lokation
Greater Manchester
Type
Andet
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Forudgående markedsdialog for fremtidig indkøb af trærisikoinspektioner og forvaltningsplaner. Søger en arborist/kvalificeret inspektør til at inventere træer på kommunal grund, vurdere risiko og uddanne personale i passiv vurdering. Involverer skrivebordsøvelse, dataindsamling, aktiv vurdering af højkonfluenszoner og personaletræning.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

14 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (5)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (2)
Teknisk (5)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Providers are invited to submit comments about the documents.
--This is a pre-market engagement and not a tender submission stage.
--ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in this pre-market engagement document.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Providers should be an Arborist or suitably qualified inspector.
--Providers should be able to put forward their interest for future procurement.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Ability to zone all SHDC and BBC sites (desk exercise).
--Ability to carry out an inventory of trees across all sites, collecting data as per current Industry/Forest Research Data Standards.
--Ability to undertake Active Assessment of trees in Zones of High Confluence.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in this pre-market engagement document.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This is a pre-market engagement document, not a formal tender. It outlines the scope for tree risk surveys and management plans, seeking feedback from potential providers. While clear in its intent, it lacks formal tender elements like evaluation criteria and detailed financial information.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The document is identified as a pre-market engagement, not a formal tender, which impacts the assessment of legal compliance. However, it provides a clear reference number and organization. The CPV code is present. The submission deadline is provided, though its reasonableness for a market engagement is debatable. The absence of a formal procedure code and type is expected for this stage.

Klarhed80/100

The description of the required services (tree inventory, risk assessment, staff training) is clear and well-defined. The AI-extracted requirements accurately reflect the stated needs. The purpose of the document as a market engagement is explicitly stated, managing expectations.

Fuldstændighed70/100

As a pre-market engagement, it is expected that not all tender-specific information is present. Basic information like title, reference, organization, and a description of the intended scope are provided. Contract duration and start date are specified. However, estimated value is not disclosed, and no tender documents with content are available.

Estimated Value not disclosed
No document content available
Retfærdighed85/100

The document is open to all interested parties to provide comments, fostering a degree of fairness. The objective is to guide future procurement, which is a transparent approach. However, the lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria for the market engagement phase means that the fairness of a future tender cannot be fully assessed at this stage.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The document specifies a submission deadline for comments and the contract duration. The contract start date is also provided. However, it is not an e-submission platform for a tender, and there is no information on financing. The primary purpose is feedback, not a formal submission.

No e-submission
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. The status is 'planning', which is consistent with a pre-market engagement. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of planning.

Bæredygtighed50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within this pre-market engagement document. Therefore, sustainability considerations are not addressed.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear purpose as pre-market engagement
Well-defined scope of services
Presence of reference number and organization
Open to provider feedback

Bekymringer

Not a formal tender document
Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
No document content available

Anbefalinger

1. Clearly state the expected format for feedback submission.
2. Consider including preliminary thoughts on evaluation criteria for the future tender to guide providers.
3. Provide access to any relevant background documents or site information.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline