Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Design og indretning af et center på High Street

Åben
Frist
9 dage tilbage
April 12, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
028464-2026
Værdi
£120,000
Lokation
Surrey, East and West Sussex, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 27, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 27, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 05, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 12, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Maj 03, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£120,000
Varighed
4 måneder
Lokation
Surrey, East and West Sussex
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Littlehampton Town Council søger at udpege en passende kvalificeret og erfaren entreprenør til at levere en omfattende intern design- og indretningsservice vedrørende det foreslåede center på High Street. Den udpegede entreprenør vil være ansvarlig for at levere projektet fra en tom skal til et fuldt færdiggjort, overholdende og operationelt rum klar til ibrugtagning.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

40 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (2)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (2)
Teknisk (34)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Tenderers will be required to propose a realistic programme for design, mobilisation, and completion of works.
--Tenderers must demonstrate cost control mechanisms.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Suitably qualified and experienced Contractor.
--Capable of providing an integrated design and build solution.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS34
--Develop a comprehensive internal design proposal aligned with Council's objectives for inclusivity, accessibility, flexibility, and community use.
--Produce detailed space planning layouts for multi-functional use.
--Incorporate inclusive design principles and ensure compliance with Equality Act 2010 and applicable Building Regulations.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Deliver the project within the agreed contract sum.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for the design and fit-out of a community hub is generally well-structured, with a clear scope of services and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on the submission process, impacting overall transparency and accessibility.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a clear procedure, CPV code, and organizational details. The estimated value and contract duration are specified. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and potential for a short submission deadline (though not flagged as per rules) could be areas for improvement in ensuring full regulatory compliance and fairness.

No evaluation criteria specified
Klarhed80/100

The description of services is comprehensive, detailing both design and fit-out requirements with specific elements. The objectives for inclusivity, accessibility, and community use are clearly articulated. The requirements for the completed hub are also well-defined.

Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The scope of services is detailed. However, the lack of available document content and the absence of specified evaluation criteria mean that crucial details for tenderers are missing.

No document content available
No evaluation criteria specified
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is an open procedure, which generally promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the requirements are described objectively without apparent tailoring to specific companies. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed, potentially impacting fairness.

No evaluation criteria specified
Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender specifies an estimated value and contract duration. However, it does not explicitly mention e-submission, and the URL for documents is not provided. Financing information is also absent. The contract start date is provided, but the lack of e-submission and document access points reduces practical usability.

No e-submission
Document URL not provided
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and CPV code are populated. The dates provided for the submission deadline and contract start are logical in sequence. There are no indications of suspension or disputes.

Bæredygtighed50/100

While the description mentions 'good environmental practice' and 'energy-efficient solutions', there are no explicit requirements for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded, limiting the potential for integrated sustainability goals.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear and comprehensive scope of services
Objective requirements without apparent company tailoring
Open procedure type
Detailed description of expected outcomes

Bekymringer

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Lack of explicit e-submission details
Limited sustainability focus

Anbefalinger

1. Publish clear evaluation criteria to enhance transparency and fairness.
2. Provide direct links to all tender documents for ease of access.
3. Consider incorporating more specific sustainability and social value objectives.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline