Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

25112 Biblioteksservice Engager, Design og Indretningskontrakt - Ely Bibliotek

Åben
Frist
48 dage tilbage
Maj 22, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
028128-2026
Værdi
£180,000
Lokation
East Anglia, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 27, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 26, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

Maj 15, 2026

Frist for tilbud

Maj 22, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Juli 06, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£180,000
Varighed
6 måneder
Lokation
East Anglia
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Denne kontrakt har til formål at udpege en passende og tilstrækkelig tilbudsgiver, der er i stand til at engagere sig med biblioteksteamet og andre interessenter for at forstå behovene og det tilsigtede resultat af ombygningen og skabe designs, som den succesfulde tilbudsgiver kan levere. Hoveddelen af denne kontrakt er engagementet med biblioteksteamet for at skabe endelige designmuligheder og tilgange, der dækker møbler, pejlemærker og skilte osv., samtidig med at man arbejder inden for et defineret budget. Det vil være en kontrakt på seks (6) måneder med en forlængelse på seks (6) måneder. En 12-måneders fejlperiode vil gælde efter overdragelsen af biblioteket.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

9 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (2)
Teknisk (4)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific submission requirements are detailed in the provided text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Must be a suitable and sufficient bidder.
--Able to engage with the Library team and other stakeholders.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Ability to understand the needs and intended outcome of the redevelopment.
--Ability to create designs for furniture, waypoints, and signage.
--Ability to deliver the created designs.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided text.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for library services engagement, design, and fit-out is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a reasonable budget. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission requirements, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and no reported disputes. The procedure is identified as 'Below threshold - open competition'. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight by some. The absence of specific mandatory exclusion grounds is noted.

Klarhed80/100

The description of the contract's purpose, which involves engaging with stakeholders to design and deliver library redevelopment elements like furniture, waypoints, and signage, is clear. The expected outcomes and the nature of the work are well-articulated. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and duration. However, the absence of detailed submission requirements and the lack of content in the attached documents significantly reduce completeness. The contract duration and defect period are specified.

No document content available
No specific submission requirements detailed
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is open to all bidders, and the estimated value is disclosed, promoting fairness. The criteria for eligibility are broadly defined as 'suitable and sufficient', which is objective. The use of an open competition procedure below the threshold is also fair. No requirements appear tailored to specific companies.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission, financing details, and the absence of content in the tender documents hinder practical application for potential bidders. The deadline is also relatively short.

No e-submission specified
No financing information provided
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided for the contract start and duration are consistent.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of specific sustainability considerations within this procurement.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear contract objectives and scope
Disclosed estimated value and duration
Open competition procedure
Proper CPV code utilization

Bekymringer

Missing specific evaluation criteria
Lack of detailed submission requirements
No content available in tender documents
Absence of sustainability considerations

Anbefalinger

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria to guide bidders.
2. Include comprehensive submission guidelines and ensure tender documents are accessible and contain relevant content.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline