Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Installation af stole i Pärnu Koncerthus og Estonia Koncerthus.

Åben
Frist
2 dage tilbage
April 06, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Byggeri
Reference
307879
Værdi
€38,000
Lokation
Estonia, Estland
Udgivet
Marts 19, 2026
CPV-kode
Evalueringskriterier
Total cost100%
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 19, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

Marts 30, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 06, 2026

Åbning af udbud

April 06, 2026

VinderchancePRO
🔒
Opgrader til Professional
Se din estimerede vinderchance baseret på historiske data.
Opgrader til Professionel →
OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
SektorsindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for sektorsindsigt
Se gennemsnitlige vinderpriser, konkurrenceniveauer og markedstrends.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
€38,000
Varighed
Ikke angivet
Lokation
Estonia
Type
Byggeri
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God
Markedsbenchmark
Gns. Vindende Pris
€524,963
Gns. Tilbud
4.7
Konkurrence
Medium
SMV Vindere
94%
5,932 udbud analyseret

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Installation af Figueras siddepladser. Fjernelse og bortskaffelse af gamle stole. Installation af nye stole. Udskiftning af fjedre, bøsninger, skruer og bolte. Dækning af gulve inden for installationsarbejdsområdet for at undgå beskadigelse af gulve, vægge og eksisterende detaljer. Producentens tilbud på de krævede produkter er som følger. Ligeberettigede produkter skal være egnede. Sættet til én stol koster 19,50 EUR. Armlæn venstre art. nr. 5200269 koster 2,9 EUR/stk. Armlæn højre art. nr. 5200268 koster 2,9 EUR/stk. Samlet hardwareomkostning for 1750 stole koster 34.125 EUR. Samlet armlæn 1200 stk. koster 3.480 EUR. Transportomkostninger til Tallinn 1.350 EUR. Transportomkostninger til Pärnu 3.400 EUR. Leveringstid 8 uger + transit. Betalingsbetingelser: 50% forud som ordrebekræftelse, 50% før afsendelse. Installatøren skal levere og udskifte de nye stolerygge og sædehynder. Ryglæn og sædehynder indkøbes af ordregiver. Skal udføres i Tallinn: 650 stole fra 5. juli til 30. juli. I Pärnu: 1100 stole fra 1. august til 25. august.
Elektronisk Afsendelse

Kør risikoanalyse

Identificer potentielle risici, uoverensstemmelser og advarselstegn på tværs af alle udbudsdokumenter. Få en detaljeret risikorapport med alvorlighedsgrader og anbefalinger til afhjælpning.

Log ind

Vinderstrategi

AI-drevet analyse af dette udbuds krav, muligheder og udfordringer. Få strategiske indsigter for at maksimere din vinderchance.

70%
Estimeret vinderchanceModerat match

This tender heavily favors cost-driven bids. A winning strategy will focus on aggressive pricing, demonstrating equivalence for specified components, and meticulous adherence to submission requirements. While social value and innovation are not explicitly weighted, demonstrating efficiency and reliability can serve as indirect differentiators.

Nøglebudskaber til at vinde

Unbeatable Value: Delivering the lowest cost installation through optimized sourcing and efficient execution.

Seamless Installation: Guaranteeing minimal disruption and protection of existing venue infrastructure.

Proven Equivalence: Providing certified equivalent components that meet or exceed manufacturer specifications.

Nøglemuligheder
Aggressive pricing strategy due to 100% cost weighting.
Leveraging existing supplier relationships for cost-effective equivalent components.
Demonstrating efficient project management to meet tight deadlines and ensure site protection.
Nøgleudfordringer
Intense price competition due to 100% cost evaluation.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify all potential cost savings. Negotiate aggressively with suppliers for equivalent components. Optimize labor and logistics to minimize on-site time and associated costs. Consider a slightly lower profit margin if necessary to secure the contract.

Proving equivalence of components to the satisfaction of the contracting authority.

Obtain detailed specifications for the required components and identify suppliers offering demonstrably equivalent or superior products. Provide comprehensive technical documentation, certifications, and potentially samples for review. Clearly articulate the benefits and compliance of the proposed equivalent parts.

Meeting the strict and sequential timeline for installations in two different locations.

Develop a detailed project schedule with buffer times. Secure resources (personnel, equipment) well in advance. Plan logistics for efficient material and personnel movement between sites. Confirm lead times with suppliers to ensure timely delivery of all components.

Ideel tilbudsgiverprofil
A specialized installation company with proven experience in furniture or seating installation, particularly in public venues. They should possess strong supply chain relationships to source equivalent components cost-effectively and have a highly efficient project management team capable of meeting tight deadlines and adhering to strict site protection protocols.
Nøglekrav
Lowest total cost
Proof of equivalence for specified components
Completion of Hankepass (ESPD)
Adherence to payment terms (50% advance, 50% before shipment)
Site protection (floors, walls, existing details)
Removal and disposal of old seats
Timely completion within specified windows (Tallinn: July 5-30, Pärnu: August 1-25)
Nøgledifferentiatorer
A highly competitive price point achieved through optimized supply chain and efficient installation processes.
A robust plan for site protection and minimal disruption, backed by past project examples.
Clear and compelling evidence of component equivalence, potentially with extended warranties or performance guarantees.
Muligheder for social værdi
While not a weighted criterion, consider a commitment to using local labor for installation where feasible, or a small donation to a local arts or educational initiative related to the concert halls.
Fokusområder for tilbud
Total cost100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price by optimizing all cost components: materials (through equivalent sourcing), labor (through efficient scheduling and skilled teams), logistics, and overhead. Ensure all costs are accurately calculated and presented clearly.

Anbefalinger7
Aggressively Price for 100% Cost Weighting
KritiskHøj indsats

Conduct a granular cost breakdown to identify all areas for cost reduction. Negotiate hard with suppliers for equivalent components. Optimize labor deployment and logistics to minimize on-site time and travel.

Maximizes score for the sole evaluation criterion.
Demonstrate Component Equivalence Clearly
KritiskMedium indsats

For each specified component (springs, bushings, screws, bolts), identify and document suitable equivalent products. Provide technical datasheets, certifications, and clear comparisons to the manufacturer's specifications. Highlight any advantages of the equivalent product.

Avoids disqualification and builds confidence in the bid.
Meticulous Hankepass (ESPD) Completion
KritiskMedium indsats

Ensure the Hankepass is completed accurately and comprehensively, adhering to all stipulated conditions and response formats. Double-check all declarations and required information.

Ensures eligibility and avoids administrative rejection.
Develop Detailed Site Protection Plan
HøjLav indsats

Outline specific measures for protecting floors, walls, and existing details during the installation process. This should include materials used (e.g., protective coverings, temporary barriers) and the methodology for their application and removal.

Addresses a key operational requirement and demonstrates professionalism.
Secure Supply Chain for Equivalents and Confirm Lead Times
HøjMedium indsats

Establish firm commitments from suppliers for equivalent components, including pricing and delivery schedules. Factor in potential delays and build contingency into the project timeline.

Mitigates risk of material shortages and delays, ensuring timely completion.
Optimize Logistics for Sequential Installations
HøjMedium indsats

Plan the efficient transportation of materials and personnel between Tallinn and Pärnu, considering the tight turnaround between the two installation periods. Coordinate delivery schedules to align with installation progress.

Ensures smooth transition between sites and adherence to deadlines.
Highlight Installation Efficiency and Expertise
MediumLav indsats

While not explicitly evaluated, emphasize the company's experience in similar projects, the skill of the installation team, and a proven track record of efficient and high-quality work. This can build confidence beyond just price.

Subtle differentiation that can influence perceived value.
Konkurrencemæssig positionering
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on quality or compliance. Emphasize the ability to deliver the required installation at the lowest price point due to optimized operations and sourcing.

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

14 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (8)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (2)
Teknisk (1)
Finansiel (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--Bidders must adhere to the conditions for submitting offers as explained in the tender documents.
--Joint offers are permitted.
--Bidders must confirm their acceptance of the conditions.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must provide a 'Hankepass' (tender pass) as an initial confirmation instead of official certificates from authorities or third parties.
--The 'Hankepass' must include the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and the expected response format.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific technical capability requirements are detailed in the provided text.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total value of the tender is 38000.0 EUR.
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

3 dokumenter tilgængelige med AI-resuméer

VastavustingimusedPDF
307879_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 4.4 KB

The tender document clarifies the conditions for submitting a bid, including joint bids, acceptance of terms, cost submission, and proof of equivalence.

Vis
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307879_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority evaluates bids primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Vis
Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307879_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 33.7 KB

The procurement passport (ESPD) is a bidder's self-declaration, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning af Dokumenter

Tilmeld dig for at se dokumentresuméer og analyser

75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for seat installation is generally well-structured with clear financial information and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks specific details on technical capabilities and sustainability aspects.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are indicated. The use of ESPD is standard practice.

Klarhed80/100

The description of the work is reasonably clear, outlining the removal of old seats, installation of new ones, and associated hardware replacement. Requirements for equivalent products are mentioned. The evaluation criteria are stated as relative weighting, with cost being the primary factor.

Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, deadlines, and organization. However, the contract duration is not explicitly specified, which is a notable omission. The number of tender documents is provided.

Missing contract duration
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender promotes fairness by allowing joint offers and requiring full document access. The value is disclosed, and the evaluation is primarily cost-based, which is objective. The use of e-procurement enhances accessibility.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender specifies electronic submission and e-procurement, which are practical. However, the contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information beyond payment terms is absent. The duration is also missing.

Contract start date not specified
Financing information beyond payment terms is absent
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of the tender.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.

No green procurement mentioned
No social criteria mentioned

Styrker

Clear financial information and estimated value
Reasonable submission and opening deadlines
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled
Objective evaluation criteria (cost-based)

Bekymringer

Missing contract duration
Lack of specific technical capability requirements
Absence of sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation)

Anbefalinger

1. Specify the contract duration clearly.
2. Include details on technical capability requirements for bidders.
3. Incorporate sustainability criteria into the evaluation or requirements.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline