Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Byggearbejder på taktikbygningen ved Sikkerhedsakademiet (Kase 61, Tallinn)

Åben
Frist
12 dage tilbage
April 16, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Byggeri
Reference
307456
Værdi
€2,360,000
Lokation
Estonia, Estland
Udgivet
Marts 12, 2026
CPV-kode
Evalueringskriterier
Total cost of works excluding VAT100%
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 12, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 09, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 16, 2026

Åbning af udbud

April 07, 2026

VinderchancePRO
🔒
Opgrader til Professional
Se din estimerede vinderchance baseret på historiske data.
Opgrader til Professionel →
OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
SektorsindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for sektorsindsigt
Se gennemsnitlige vinderpriser, konkurrenceniveauer og markedstrends.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
€2,360,000
Varighed
14 måneder
Lokation
Estonia
Type
Byggeri
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God
Markedsbenchmark
Gns. Vindende Pris
€524,963
Gns. Tilbud
4.7
Konkurrence
Medium
SMV Vindere
94%
5,932 udbud analyseret

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Formålet med udbuddet er at finde en hovedentreprenør til byggearbejder, som vil rekonstruere og ombygge den eksisterende sportshal på Sikkerhedsakademiet til en uddannelsesbygning. Derudover er det nødvendigt at etablere de nødvendige tekniske net, veje, pladser og anlæg til betjening af bygningen, i overensstemmelse med ordregivers udbudsmateriale og designopgavens grunddata.
Grønt IndkøbElektronisk Afsendelse

Kør risikoanalyse

Identificer potentielle risici, uoverensstemmelser og advarselstegn på tværs af alle udbudsdokumenter. Få en detaljeret risikorapport med alvorlighedsgrader og anbefalinger til afhjælpning.

Log ind

Vinderstrategi

AI-drevet analyse af dette udbuds krav, muligheder og udfordringer. Få strategiske indsigter for at maksimere din vinderchance.

70%
Estimeret vinderchanceModerat match

This tender for the Sisekaitseakadeemia tactical building construction is heavily weighted towards price. A winning strategy will focus on aggressive cost optimization, demonstrating robust project management capabilities, and meticulous adherence to all mandatory requirements. While social value and innovation are not explicitly evaluated, demonstrating a commitment to quality and timely delivery will be crucial.

Nøglebudskaber til at vinde

Delivering exceptional value through optimized cost and efficient execution.

Ensuring project success with a highly qualified and experienced team.

Commitment to quality and timely completion of the Sisekaitseakadeemia tactical building.

Nøglemuligheder
Aggressive pricing strategy due to 100% cost evaluation.
Demonstrating strong project management and technical expertise through CVs.
Leveraging existing relationships with reliable subcontractors for cost-effective delivery.
Proactive engagement with the contracting authority for clarifications on technical specifications.
Nøgleudfordringer
Intense price competition due to 100% cost evaluation.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, identify all potential cost savings, and explore efficient construction methods. Negotiate favorable terms with suppliers and subcontractors. Consider lean construction principles.

Ensuring all mandatory requirements, including forms and documentation, are perfectly completed.

Implement a rigorous internal review process for all submitted documents. Assign dedicated personnel to manage bid preparation and quality control. Utilize checklists based on tender requirements.

Potential for unforeseen site conditions or technical complexities in the reconstruction.

Conduct a thorough site visit and risk assessment. Include contingency in the cost proposal for potential issues. Clearly define scope and responsibilities in the contract.

Ideel tilbudsgiverprofil
An experienced general contractor with a proven track record in public sector construction projects, particularly educational or institutional buildings. The ideal bidder will possess strong cost control mechanisms, a highly qualified and experienced project team, and efficient subcontractor management capabilities. They should also have a clear understanding of Estonian construction regulations and standards.
Nøglekrav
Lowest total cost of offer excluding VAT
Project manager, site manager, strong current specialist, and fire and alarm system specialist CVs (Form 4)
Completion of Form 2 and Form 3
Subcontractor data submission
Compliance with mandatory exclusion grounds
Background checks for employees on site
Nøgledifferentiatorer
Demonstrated ability to deliver projects within budget and ahead of schedule.
Innovative approaches to construction methodology that reduce costs or improve efficiency, even if not explicitly evaluated.
Strong client references from similar public sector projects.
A highly experienced and stable project team with a proven track record on complex builds.
Muligheder for social værdi
While not explicitly evaluated, consider including a statement on commitment to local employment and skills development during the project lifecycle. This can be a subtle differentiator and align with broader public sector objectives.
Fokusområder for tilbud
Total cost of works excluding VAT100.0%

Develop a highly competitive and detailed cost breakdown. Identify all opportunities for cost reduction through efficient design, material sourcing, and construction methods. Ensure all direct and indirect costs are accurately accounted for, with a lean profit margin to be the lowest bidder.

Anbefalinger6
Aggressive Cost Optimization
KritiskHøj indsats

Given the 100% cost evaluation, every effort must be made to submit the lowest possible price while ensuring profitability and quality. This involves detailed cost engineering, efficient supply chain management, and lean construction practices.

Directly impacts the primary evaluation criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Meticulous Form and Documentation Completion
KritiskMedium indsats

Ensure Forms 2, 3, and 4 are completed accurately and comprehensively, with no omissions or errors. Pay close attention to subcontractor data and the distinction of trade secrets as per requirements.

Avoids disqualification and demonstrates attention to detail.
Demonstrate Project Team Qualifications
KritiskMedium indsats

Submit high-quality CVs for the project manager, site manager, and specialists that clearly highlight their relevant experience and qualifications, aligning with the project's technical requirements.

Meets a key technical capability requirement and builds confidence in execution.
Proactive Risk Management and Contingency Planning
MediumMedium indsats

While not explicitly evaluated, a well-articulated approach to identifying and mitigating project risks, including a realistic contingency plan, can instill confidence in the contracting authority regarding project delivery.

Enhances perceived reliability and professionalism.
Thorough Site Visit and Technical Clarification
HøjMedium indsats

Conduct a comprehensive site visit to understand the existing conditions and potential challenges. Actively seek clarifications on the technical description (Lisa 1) to ensure a precise and cost-effective bid.

Reduces the risk of cost overruns and improves bid accuracy.
Subtle Social Value Messaging
LavLav indsats

Integrate a brief statement about commitment to local employment, sustainability practices (e.g., waste reduction), or community engagement within the bid narrative, even if not a formal evaluation criterion.

Aligns with broader public procurement goals and can be a subtle positive differentiator.
Konkurrencemæssig positionering
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on the quality and timely delivery of the Sisekaitseakadeemia tactical building. Emphasize the strength and experience of the project team as a guarantee of successful execution.

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

24 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (10)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (8)
Teknisk (3)
Finansiel (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS10
--Bidders must submit an offer following the contracting authority's conditions.
--Subcontractor data must be provided.
--Trade secrets must be distinguished.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Background checks will be performed on the successful bidder's employees before they are allowed on site.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--Bidders must submit an offer in accordance with the contracting authority's conditions.
--Bidders must provide subcontractor data.
--Bidders must distinguish trade secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Project manager, site manager, strong current specialist, and fire and alarm system specialist CVs must be submitted (Form 4).
--CVs for the project manager, site manager, and specialists must be submitted (Form 4).
--The technical description defines the scope, requirements, and basis documents for the construction works, including the process for preparing and approving the construction and work project.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender will be evaluated based on the total cost of the offer excluding VAT, with the lowest price being the best.
--Bidders must submit Form 3, which includes a detailed cost table for the different stages of construction work.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

12 dokumenter tilgængelige med AI-resuméer

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307456_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds regarding criminal convictions for fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing before contract execution.

Vis
VastavustingimusedPDF
307456_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 17.1 KB

Bidders must submit a bid adhering to the contracting authority's conditions, providing subcontractor data, distinguishing trade secrets, and completing Forms 2 and 3, including the required project manager qualifications.

Vis
Vorm 2DOC
Vorm 2 1203.docx -- 19.0 KB

Form 2 is an application for participation in the tender procedure, confirming the bid's compliance with all conditions and requirements, including those regarding subcontractors and trade secrets.

Vis
Vorm 3XLS
VORM 3_Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel (1203).xlsx -- 35.8 KB

The bidder must submit Form 3, which includes a detailed cost breakdown table for various stages of construction work.

Vis
Vorm 4DOC
Vorm 4 (1203).docx -- 18.4 KB

The contracting authority requires the submission of CVs for the project manager, site manager, low-voltage specialist, and fire and alarm system specialist on Form 4.

Vis
Vorm 4DOC
Vorm 4 (1203).docx -- 18.4 KB

The tender requires the submission of Form 4, which includes CVs for the project manager, site manager, and specialists to assess their qualifications.

Vis
Vorm 8DOC
Vorm 8 (1203).docx -- 13.7 KB

Form 8 is a joint bid authorization letter, empowering one bidder to represent other participants in a joint bid.

Vis
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307456_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.7 KB

The tender evaluates the total cost of works without VAT, where the lowest price is the best.

Vis
Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307456_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 71.3 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected format of bidder responses.

Vis
Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekDOC
Alusdokument pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek (1... -- 46.7 KB

This document provides instructions for submitting a bid for the tender 'Sisekaitseakadeemia tactical building construction works', including electronic submission requirements and procedures for accessing the technical description.

Vis
Lisa 1. Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus ehitustööd_2025 (1... -- 415.6 KB

This technical specification defines the scope, requirements, and foundational documents for the construction works of the Sisekaitseakadeemia tactical building, including the construction project and the process of developing and approving the work project.

Vis
Lisa 2. Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt (1203).docx -- 143.0 KB

This document is a draft construction works contract, outlining general and specific terms, including contractor and client details, project and site information, and penalty clauses.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning af Dokumenter

Tilmeld dig for at se dokumentresuméer og analyser

75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for the Sisekaitseakadeemia tactical building construction works is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a reasonable process. However, it could benefit from more explicit sustainability considerations and clearer guidance on accessing restricted documents.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements for public procurement. Deadlines are specified, and the procedure is outlined. The CPV code is provided. No disputes are indicated. The mention of 'or equivalent' for standards is a positive aspect for legal compliance and fairness.

Klarhed80/100

The description of the works is clear, outlining the reconstruction and new construction of technical networks, roads, and landscaping. Key requirements are documented, and evaluation criteria are specified. However, the access to 'restricted information' in the base documents could be clearer.

Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. Key documents like technical specifications, contract drafts, and various forms are listed. However, the 'Value Classified: Yes' might imply some financial details are not fully disclosed, impacting completeness.

Retfærdighed85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. The evaluation is based on relative weighting, with price being a key factor. The 'or equivalent' clause for standards is a good practice. The requirement for background checks on employees is a specific but justifiable measure for this type of facility.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are supported. The contract duration is specified. However, the 'Contract start date is presumptive and has no legal significance' might create some ambiguity for bidders planning resources. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

Contract start date presumptive
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logically presented.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is positive. However, there is no explicit detail on how this will be evaluated or what specific green criteria will be applied. Social aspects and innovation are not clearly defined.

Lack of specific green procurement details
No explicit social or innovation criteria

Styrker

Clear project description and scope
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement
Inclusion of 'or equivalent' for standards
Detailed list of required forms and CVs

Bekymringer

Ambiguity regarding access to restricted information
Presumptive contract start date
Lack of specific details on sustainability criteria

Anbefalinger

1. Provide clearer instructions or a separate document detailing how to access restricted information.
2. Clarify the implications of the presumptive contract start date for bidders.
3. Elaborate on the specific criteria and evaluation methods for 'Green Procurement'.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline