Dismantling and Assembly of Sõle Sports Centre Pneumatic Hall

This tender for the disassembly and assembly of the Sõle Sports Center pneumatic hall is well-structured, transparent, and fair, with clear requirements and comprehensive documentation. Its primary area for improvement lies in the integration of sustainability criteria.

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance, utilizing the ESPD and clearly outlining exclusion grounds. Deadlines are reasonable. The CPV code is acceptable but could be more precise for the specific service, and the procedure type 'A' with 'Negotiation Allowed' could benefit from further clarification for broader understanding, though likely clear within the national context.

The tender's description, requirements, and evaluation criteria are exceptionally clear and unambiguous. The AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive, and supporting documents further detail technical specifications and contractual terms, ensuring bidders fully understand expectations.

All essential information, including basic details, financial data, timeline, classification, and location, is comprehensively provided. The tender includes a robust set of 8 documents covering all aspects from qualification to contract terms, ensuring a complete information package for bidders.

This tender exhibits high fairness, offering full document access, disclosing the estimated value, and setting reasonable preparation times. The evaluation criteria (lowest price) are objective and transparent, and e-procurement is enabled. Requirements are generic and do not appear tailored to a specific company, with a reasonable justification for not dividing the tender into lots.

The tender is highly practical, supporting electronic submission and providing a clear URL for the e-procurement portal. The contract duration is explicitly stated, and financial information is available. The absence of an explicit contract start date is a minor point and common in procurement processes.

Data consistency is excellent, with all key fields populated accurately and logically. There are no detected issues, suspensions, or disputes, and all dates are consistent and follow a logical sequence.

The tender lacks explicit criteria related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. There is no indication of EU funding, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards. This represents a significant area for improvement.