Möchten Sie sich auf öffentliche Ausschreibungen bewerben? Sehen Sie sich unseren TaaS-Service zur Vorbereitung von Ausschreibungen
Ausschreibungen

Externe Prüfungsdienstleistungen

Offen
Frist
251 Tage verbleibend
4. April 2027
Vertragsdetails
Kategorie
Restricted Procedure
Referenz
018660-2026
Wert
£375,000
Standort
United Kingdom, Vereinigtes Königreich
Veröffentlicht
20. Juli 2026
CPV-Code
Zeitplan des Projekts

Ausschreibung veröffentlicht

2. März 2026

Frist für Fragen

28. März 2027

Angebotsfrist

4. April 2027

Vertragsbeginn

4. April 2027

BieterinformationenPRO
🔒
Bieterinformationen freischalten
Sehen Sie Ausgabenmuster, bevorzugte Verfahren und mehr.
Upgrade auf Professional →
Budget
£375,000
Dauer
36 Monate
Standort
United Kingdom
Typ
Restricted Procedure
75
Qualitätsbewertung/100
Gut

Ursprüngliche Ausschreibungsbeschreibung

1. Introduction: The Arts University Bournemouth (“AUB” or “the University”) wishes to appoint an external auditor to undertake the annual audit of the University and its subsidiary companies. This tender invites proposals from suitably qualified and independent firms to provide a comprehensive external audit service in accordance with current regulatory requirements and best practice in higher education. The audit will cover the University’s consolidated financial statements and those o f each subsidiary entity and will include a separate regularity opinion and other audit-related reports as required. 2. The client: AUB is a specialist university providing education in art, design, media and performance. It is a higher education corporation and an exempt charity regulated by the Office for Students (OfS). The University operates from its campus in Poole, Dorset and serves a community of undergraduate, postgraduate and research students. AUB has a number of subsidiary companies, currently including AUB Services Ltd (which is dormant and holds property assets) and AUB Enterprises Ltd, which operates the University’s innovation and business‑incubation facilities. In addition, the University consolidates an associated charity, Arts University Bournemouth Charitable Foundation, whose trustees include members of the University’s Board. Financial statements are prepared on a consolidated basis for the year ending 31 July and must be audited within five months of the year‑end. 3. Background and scope of the contract: The University periodically retenders its external audit services to ensure probity and value for money. The current contract has reached the end of its agreed term, and the University therefore invites tenders for the appointment of external auditors for a proposed term of three years (financial years 2026/27 to 2028/29) with an option to extend for up to two additional years, subject to satisfactory performance. The contract covers the audit of: The consolidated financial statements of AUB prepared under the Statement of Recommended Practice: Accounting for Further and Higher Education and Financial Reporting Standard (FRS 102) (or any successor) or International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted in the UK. The individual financial statements of AUB Services Ltd and AUB Enterprises Ltd and any new subsidiaries incorporated during the contract period. The financial statements of the Arts University Bournemouth Charitable Foundation. Any other returns or statements that require an external audit opinion, including the Teachers’ Pension Scheme return and the Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) Finance Record or its successor. 4. Regulatory environment and audit requirements: Under the Higher Education and Research Act 2017 and the OfS’s regulatory framework, AUB is required to have its financial statements audited by independent external auditors who are registered on the Register of Statutory Auditors. Further more as a Charity the audit firm must also comply with FRC audit standards. Key requirements include: Independence – The external auditor must be independent of the University and of the preparers of the accounts and must not carry out work that compromises that independence. The OfS requires that the trial balance is prepared and approved by the University, not by the auditors. The audit firm must confirm that it is listed on the Register of Statutory Auditors. Audit opinion – The auditor must report on whether the financial statements give a true and fair view of the University’s financial position and performance and whether they have been properly prepared in accordance with UK GAAP/FRS 102 or IFRS and the OfS Accounts Direction. The auditor’s report must also state whether funds from the OfS, UK Research & Innovation, Education and Skills Funding Agency and other funders have been applied for the purposes provided and in accordance with relevant terms and conditions. Regularity opinion – The auditor must provide an opinion on the regularity and propriety of the University’s use of public funds and confirm that OfS requirements (including the accounts direction) have been met. The OfS guidance emphasises that the external auditor’s report must cover all components of the financial statements and be signed by the auditor, the accountable officer and the chair of the governing body. Management letter – The auditor must produce a management letter (or equivalent) highlighting significant accounting and control issues, making recommendations and noting the extent of reliance on the internal audit service. The management letter and management responses must be presented to the Audit & Risk Committee in time to inform its annual report. Providers registered with the OfS must publish their audited financial statements within two weeks of being signed and, at the latest, five months after the financial year‑end. The University is accountable for submitting financial returns through the OfS portal in accordance with the Annual Financial Return guidance and the Accounts Direction. 5. Standards and reporting framework: The audit must be conducted in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) issued by the Financial Reporting Council and take account of: The Statement of Recommended Practice: Accounting for Further and Higher Education (SORP) and any subsequent revisions. The OfS Accounts Direction and related Regulatory Advice 14 (Guidance for the Annual Financial Return), which specify content and disclosure requirements and emphasise auditor independence. Relevant legislation, including the Companies Act (where applicable), the Charities Act, and the Teachers’ Pension Regulations. The University’s Financial Framework and Regulations, which set out governance arrangements, the responsibilities of the Board, the Finance & Resources Committee and the Audit & Risk Committee. 6. Scope of services: The appointed audit firm will be required to: Plan and execute the audit of the University and each subsidiary and associated entity to obtain reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Test systems of financial control, review accounting policies and evaluate the appropriateness of accounting estimates and judgements. Provide an audit report on the consolidated financial statements, separate reports for each subsidiary company and the charity, and any required regularity reports. Audit the Teachers’ Pension Scheme return and provide assurance as required by the Teachers’ Pension Agency. U.S. Federal (Title IV) audit requirements. Experience delivering audit services that comply with U.S. Federal (Title IV) audit requirements applicable to UK universities enrolling U.S. students receiving federal financial aid. Audit the HESA Finance Record or its successor and ensure consistency with the audited financial statements. Prepare and present a management letter summarising findings and recommendations, including comments on internal control weaknesses, compliance with regulations and any matters arising from the audit of subsidiary companies. Attend meetings of the Audit & Risk Committee, Finance & Resources Committee and Board of Governors where audit matters are considered, including presenting the audit plan and audit findings. Provide advice on technical accounting and regulatory developments affecting the higher education sector where such advice does not compromise auditor independence.

Risikoanalyse

Die Risikoanalyse ist für Ausschreibungen in diesem Land noch nicht verfügbar. Aktuell unterstützt: Estland, Lettland, Litauen, Polen, Frankreich, Großbritannien, Dänemark, Niederlande, Norwegen und Finnland.

Erfolgsstrategie

Erhalten Sie eine KI-gestützte Gewinnstrategie, die auf diese Ausschreibung zugeschnitten ist. Beinhaltet Gewinnwahrscheinlichkeits-Score, wichtige Chancen und Herausforderungen, empfohlene Schwerpunkte für Angebote, Einblicke in die Wettbewerbspositionierung und umsetzbare Empfehlungen zur Maximierung Ihrer Chancen.

Anmelden

Wettbewerber

Upgrade, um zu sehen, welche Unternehmen wahrscheinlich auf diese Ausschreibung bieten werden, basierend auf historischen Beschaffungsdaten.

Anmelden

Anforderungen & Qualifikationen

37 Anforderungen in 5 Kategorien

Einreichung (3)
Verpflichtend (1)
Konformität (3)
Technisch (29)
Finanziell (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Proposals must be submitted from suitably qualified and independent firms.
--The audit firm must confirm that it is listed on the Register of Statutory Auditors.
--Providers registered with the OfS must publish their audited financial statements within two weeks of being signed and, at the latest, five months after the financial year-end.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Firms must be registered on the Register of Statutory Auditors.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Must be a suitably qualified and independent firm.
--Must be registered on the Register of Statutory Auditors.
--Must comply with FRC audit standards as a Charity.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS29
--Ability to undertake the annual audit of the University and its subsidiary companies.
--Ability to provide a comprehensive external audit service in accordance with current regulatory requirements and best practice in higher education.
--Ability to audit consolidated financial statements and those of each subsidiary entity.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Not explicitly stated, but implied to be financially sound to undertake the contract.

Vorschau der Anforderungen

Registrieren Sie sich, um vollständige Anforderungen und Analysen anzuzeigen

Dokumente

3 Dokumente mit KI-Zusammenfassungen verfügbar

OCDS RecordDOC
018660-2026_ocds_record.json

Keine Zusammenfassung für dieses Dokument verfügbar.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
018660-2026_ocds_release.json

Keine Zusammenfassung für dieses Dokument verfügbar.

Official PDF VersionPDF
018660-2026_official.pdf

Keine Zusammenfassung für dieses Dokument verfügbar.

Vorschau der Dokumente

Registrieren Sie sich, um Dokumentenzusammenfassungen und Analysen anzuzeigen

75
Gut

Qualitätsbewertung der Ausschreibung

This tender for external audit services is generally well-structured, with a clear scope and detailed requirements. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and a reveal date for submissions, impacting completeness and legal compliance.

Bewertungsaufschlüsselung

Rechtliche Konformität75/100

The tender appears compliant with general procurement regulations, specifying a clear CPV code and detailing regulatory requirements. However, the absence of an explicit reveal date for submitted documents and the lack of specified evaluation criteria could present minor issues regarding procedural transparency and legal certainty. Deadlines, while present, are a significant point of concern.

Missing reveal date for submissions
No evaluation criteria specified
Klarheit80/100

The description of services, client, and scope is exceptionally clear and detailed, leaving little room for ambiguity. Requirements are well-documented and specific, based on the AI-extracted list. The criteria for success, while not explicitly listed under an 'evaluation' section, are implicitly derived from the extensive technical and regulatory requirements.

Vollständigkeit70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the absence of a specific reveal date for received documents and a clear set of evaluation criteria prevents a higher score. While core details are there, the procedural completeness is impacted.

Missing reveal date
No explicit evaluation criteria
Fairness85/100

The tender is fair, with full access to documentation (implied by the tender structure), disclosed value, and objective, detailed criteria derived from regulatory and technical needs. The use of a competitive flexible procedure and e-procurement (implied by the system) supports fairness. Requirements are not tailored to specific companies, promoting an open market.

Praktikabilität65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration, and the estimated value is clear. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission mechanisms, direct document URLs, and specific financing details limits its practicality. The implied manual submission process, if e-submission is not explicitly stated, would also be a drawback.

No explicit mention of e-submission method
No direct document URL provided
Datenkonsistenz90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and CPV are populated correctly. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided for submission deadline and contract start are identical, which is illogical and indicates a data inconsistency that needs immediate correction.

Submission Deadline and Contract Start Date are identical and illogically set to the same time.
Nachhaltigkeit50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation initiatives. It is not indicated as EU funded. While not a mandatory requirement for all tenders, the lack of any such considerations results in a low score in this category.

No mention of green procurement criteria
No social responsibility aspects included

Stärken

Detailed and clear description of services and client
Comprehensive technical and regulatory requirements listed
Clear CPV code and estimated value provided
Fairness in objective criteria and open market approach

Bedenken

Illogical and identical Submission Deadline and Contract Start Date
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Absence of information on e-submission and document access
No sustainability or innovation considerations

Empfehlungen

1. Correct the submission deadline and contract start date to be logically sequential.
2. Provide explicit evaluation criteria for bidders to understand scoring.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and provide direct links to tender documents.

Vorschau der KI-Bewertung

Registrieren Sie sich, um vollständige Anforderungen und Analysen anzuzeigen

Vollständige Qualitätsbewertungsanalyse
Detaillierte Unterbewertungsaufschlüsselung
Einblicke in Stärken und Bedenken
Strategische Empfehlungen

Keine Kreditkarte erforderlich • Einrichtung in 2 Minuten

Zur Pipeline hinzufügen