2526-01-DTS-SS-YH – Studentengesundheits- und Sozialpflegesystem

This tender for a Student Health and Social Care Placement System is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a disclosed value. However, it lacks detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and clarity.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, with a clear CPV code and no reported disputes. The procedure is competitive. However, the deadline for submission is relatively short given the contract start date, which could be a minor concern for legal compliance regarding reasonable timelines.

The description of the required Student Placement System is clear and concise, outlining the need for an integrated solution. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed technical/eligibility requirements makes it difficult for potential bidders to fully understand the precise expectations.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. However, the lack of detailed requirements and the unavailability of document content significantly reduce the completeness of the tender package for potential bidders.

The tender discloses the estimated value and uses a competitive procedure, promoting fairness. The access to documents is implied but not explicitly detailed. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, which is a positive indicator of fairness.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the absence of document content hinder practical engagement for potential bidders. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical, although the submission deadline and contract start date being identical is unusual and potentially problematic.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these sustainability criteria.