Dynamic procurement system regarding soil landfill

This tender for a dynamic purchasing system for soil disposal is generally well-structured with a clear description of services and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission requirements, impacting completeness and practicality.

The tender adheres to standard procurement practices with a clear CPV code and an open procedure. The submission deadline is exceptionally long (over 10 years), which is unusual and could be flagged. However, assuming this is a typo and a standard deadline would be applied, the legal compliance is otherwise sound.

The description of the required services is detailed and comprehensive, outlining various aspects of soil handling, treatment, and disposal. The eligibility and technical capability requirements are clearly articulated.

While the core information like title, reference, organization, estimated value, and CPV code are present, the tender is missing crucial details such as specific evaluation criteria, contract duration, and detailed submission requirements. The availability of tender documents is indicated, but their content is not directly accessible within the provided text.

The tender appears fair, with an open procedure and a disclosed estimated value. The requirements are described in a way that should allow any qualified company to bid. There are no obvious indications of tailoring requirements to specific companies.

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is positive. However, the lack of specific submission requirements and the absence of a clear contract start date or financing information reduce its practicality. The extremely long submission deadline also raises practical concerns.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and CPV code are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical, with the notice date preceding the submission deadline.

The tender mentions compliance with environmental legislation, which is a positive step towards sustainability. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation focus, limiting its sustainability score.