UOW954 Sicherheitspersonal - PSQ

This tender is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and document content, impacting completeness and clarity.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a clear CPV code and no reported disputes. The procedure type is specified. However, the submission deadline relative to the contract start date could be tighter, and the absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural gap.

The description provides a good overview of the service required, including the intention for a hybrid working model. The AI-extracted requirements outline key areas, but specific details are deferred to tender documents, which are not accessible. This lack of detail in the initial notice limits overall clarity.

Essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and duration is present. However, the critical omission of accessible tender documents and specified evaluation criteria significantly reduces the completeness of the information provided in this notice.

The tender discloses the estimated value and has a reasonable deadline. The procedure is competitive, and the requirements, as outlined, are objective. The lack of specific company tailoring is positive. However, the absence of information on e-submission and the full document access limits the perception of complete fairness.

The contract duration and start date are specified. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the unavailability of document URLs hinder practical engagement. Financing information is not detailed.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical, with the submission deadline preceding the contract start date.

The tender notice does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these sustainability criteria.