Strategisches Vermögensmanagementprogramm – Los 1 – Wohnungsbauinvestitionen & Sanierung

This tender presents a well-defined scope for a significant asset management programme with a clear financial estimate and duration. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission procedures, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

The tender adheres to general regulatory compliance with a clear procedure and CPV code. The estimated value and duration are specified. However, the absence of a reveal date and specific evaluation criteria could pose minor compliance risks if not addressed in the full documentation.

The description of works is comprehensive, detailing various aspects of home investment and retrofit. Requirements for contractor experience are clearly outlined. The commercial model (target cost) is explained, providing good clarity on the intended contractual relationship.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and duration is present. The scope of works is detailed. However, crucial elements like specific submission requirements, detailed financial requirements, and the content of the tender documents are missing, reducing overall completeness.

The tender discloses the estimated value and has a reasonable duration. The requirements for contractor experience are objective and broadly defined, avoiding specific company tailoring. The use of a competitive flexible procedure suggests a fair process, assuming the full documentation details objective evaluation.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, it lacks information on e-submission, a direct URL for documents, and details on financing, which hinders practical assessment and participation. The absence of a reveal date also impacts planning.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, estimated value, and duration are populated logically. The contract start date aligns with the submission deadline, indicating good internal consistency. There are no reported disputes or suspensions.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding. While the scope of works (retrofit and energy efficiency) inherently has sustainability implications, these are not highlighted as specific procurement criteria.