Brauchen Sie Hilfe von Ausschreibungsexperten? Sehen Sie unseren Service zur Angebotserstellung
Ausschreibungen

Breitbanddienste für die Museen der Royal Navy

Offen
Frist
8 Tage verbleibend
5. Oktober 2026
Vertragsdetails
Kategorie
Open Procedure
Referenz
083263-2026
Wert
£300,000
Standort
North East England, Vereinigtes Königreich
Veröffentlicht
20. September 2026
Organisation
CPV-Code
Zeitplan des Projekts

Ausschreibung veröffentlicht

3. September 2026

Frist für Fragen

28. September 2026

Angebotsfrist

5. Oktober 2026

Vertragsbeginn

21. Oktober 2026

Budget
£300,000
Dauer
36 Monate
Standort
North East England
Typ
Open Procedure

Ursprüngliche Ausschreibungsbeschreibung

All existing broadband connections to Museum sites are provided by a single supplier. The individual Museum sites are currently interlinked via an MPLS network provided by the current supplier. Each site has a Juniper SRX300 router installed which is managed by the current ISP. The Portsmouth HQ site has a Juniper SRX340. Backup connections are also present at each site for redundancy, with a separate router installed and managed by the current ISP. The backup connection at the Portsmouth HQ site terminates into a separate building. As part of the MPLS network provided by the current ISP, all sites route through a cloud firewall and have a centralised internet breakout. We are provided visibility over the cloud firewall through an online portal which allows us to view and download firewall logs and add/edit/remove inbound firewall rules for our sites as required. Museum IT infrastructure and services are centralised at the HQ site in Portsmouth. Other sites communicate with this infrastructure to access resources over the MPLS network. Multiple VLANs are in use across all Museums sites to support differing requirements. The Museum also has a presence in Microsoft Azure and an offsite datacentre, which is hosting a full Disaster Recovery infrastructure, but these do not form part of the existing MPLS network. The broadband connection at the Portsmouth HQ site is currently shared between 6 separate businesses onsite, each with their own public IP address(es). The Museum also has requirements to route certain services using individual public IP addresses. The current site connections are outlined in the document. Royal Navy Museums is evaluating different broadband options available and as part of this procurement, would like to consider two technologies that we believe can deliver the requirements of the business; MPLS and SD-WAN. As the Museum has been operating on an MPLS network for several years, we know that this technology can deliver the requirements. SD-WAN has previously been considered but never implemented for the Museum. The Museum is now in a position to evaluate its suitability to deliver the requirements, whilst assessing potential benefits and cost savings. This procurement has been split into two lots, representing the separate considerations for MPLS and SD-WAN. To help the Museum make an informed decision, we would like to invite suppliers to respond to both lots and pitch solutions for both MPLS and SD-WAN. This will allow the Museum to assess the benefits, operating costs and overall suitability of the two solutions to help identify which is best able to deliver the requirements over the next 3-5 years. Whilst we would encourage suppliers to respond to both lots to help inform our decision, Royal Navy Museums recognise that this may not be possible for all suppliers. Therefore, if a supplier is only able to offer a solution for one of the lots, we would still welcome their response. It should be noted that, following evaluation, only one of the two lots will be awarded depending on the suitability of each solution for the Museum. Where possible, we would like all sites to be managed under a single contract. The internal networking of our sites is out of scope of this procurement. Suppliers also do not need to include connectivity for the offsite datacentre in their proposal. Pricing The maximum budget available for the individual lots are detailed within the individual lot requirements. Cost proposals should include any installation and equipment costs, if appropriate. As part of your submission, please indicate when billing for services would be expected to start.

Risikoanalyse

Die Risikoanalyse ist für Ausschreibungen in diesem Land noch nicht verfügbar. Aktuell unterstützt: Estland, Lettland, Litauen, Polen, Frankreich, Großbritannien, Dänemark, Niederlande, Norwegen und Finnland.

Erfolgsstrategie

Erhalten Sie eine KI-gestützte Gewinnstrategie, die auf diese Ausschreibung zugeschnitten ist. Beinhaltet Gewinnwahrscheinlichkeits-Score, wichtige Chancen und Herausforderungen, empfohlene Schwerpunkte für Angebote, Einblicke in die Wettbewerbspositionierung und umsetzbare Empfehlungen zur Maximierung Ihrer Chancen.

Anmelden

Wettbewerber

Upgrade, um zu sehen, welche Unternehmen wahrscheinlich auf diese Ausschreibung bieten werden, basierend auf historischen Beschaffungsdaten.

Anmelden

Anforderungen & Qualifikationen

KI extrahiert und organisiert alle Anforderungen aus den Ausschreibungsunterlagen – obligatorische Qualifikationen, technische Spezifikationen, finanzielle Bedingungen und Einreichungsregeln – klar kategorisiert, damit Sie genau wissen, was für ein Angebot erforderlich ist.

Anmelden

Grundlegende Anforderungen

  • Company registration in EU required
  • Proven track record in similar projects
  • Financial stability documentation

Dokumente

3 Dokumente mit KI-Zusammenfassungen verfügbar

OCDS RecordDOC
083263-2026_ocds_record.json

Keine Zusammenfassung für dieses Dokument verfügbar.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
083263-2026_ocds_release.json

Keine Zusammenfassung für dieses Dokument verfügbar.

Official PDF VersionPDF
083263-2026_official.pdf

Keine Zusammenfassung für dieses Dokument verfügbar.

Vorschau der Dokumente

Registrieren Sie sich, um Dokumentenzusammenfassungen und Analysen anzuzeigen

Qualitätsbewertung

Umfassende Qualitätsanalyse dieser Ausschreibung, die rechtliche Konformität, Klarheit, Vollständigkeit, Fairness, Praktikabilität, Datenkonsistenz und Nachhaltigkeit auf einer Skala von 0-100 mit detaillierter Aufschlüsselung und Empfehlungen bewertet.

Anmelden