Dienstleistungen über den Zähler hinaus

This tender for 'Services Beyond the Meter' by Northern Gas Networks Limited is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on e-submission, impacting its overall practicality and transparency.

The tender adheres to general regulatory compliance by specifying CPV codes and requiring adherence to OFGEM governance and mandatory competency standards. The procedure is described as 'Competitive flexible procedure'. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and a missing reveal date are minor procedural gaps. The deadline is considered reasonable given the scope.

The description of services, scope of work, and eligibility requirements are clearly articulated. The breakdown of the framework into supply only and supply & installation, with geographic limitations, is well-defined. Mandatory certifications are explicitly listed.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date. However, the 'Documents with content/summaries' count is zero, suggesting that crucial tender documents may not be readily accessible or detailed enough, impacting completeness.

The tender promotes fairness by aiming to enable participation from smaller SMEs and by clearly stating the maximum number of suppliers per area and per supply type. The selection criteria for individual jobs (location, price, availability) are objective. The zero-value framework agreement is unusual but clearly stated.

The tender specifies a contract duration and start date, and the estimated value is disclosed. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the absence of document content reduce its practicality for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The contract start date aligns with the submission deadline, which is logically consistent for a framework agreement.

The tender mentions supporting vulnerable customers and Ofgem funding, which has social implications. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement, innovation, or EU funding, limiting its sustainability score.