Möchten Sie sich auf öffentliche Ausschreibungen bewerben? Sehen Sie sich unseren TaaS-Service zur Vorbereitung von Ausschreibungen
Ausschreibungen

ESCC - AW - SESLIP Genehmigte Liste

Offen
Frist
129 Tage verbleibend
14. Dezember 2026
Vertragsdetails
Kategorie
Open Procedure
Referenz
030907-2021
Wert
£5,000,000
Standort
Surrey, East and West Sussex, Vereinigtes Königreich
Veröffentlicht
30. Juli 2026
CPV-Code
Zeitplan des Projekts

Ausschreibung veröffentlicht

13. Dezember 2021

Frist für Fragen

7. Dezember 2026

Angebotsfrist

14. Dezember 2026

Vertragsbeginn

13. Dezember 2021

Budget
£5,000,000
Dauer
61 Monate
Standort
Surrey, East and West Sussex
Typ
Open Procedure
71
Qualitätsbewertung/100
Gut

Ursprüngliche Ausschreibungsbeschreibung

The SESLIP encourages and supports the political and professional leadership and management of local authority Children’s Services, to demonstrate, develop and share good practice. Our programmes support the development of Children’s Services as learning organisations, focusing on: identifying key strands of enquiry, analysing and comparing operational data about the services, using evidence to inform decisions, including evidence available from outside the region, where relevant, using peer challenge and peer review, building leadership capacity and capability, developing standards of practice through supportive endeavour. There is a Regional Improvement Plan which sets out the activities. Its aim is to identify ways in which local authorities in the South East can support each other to improve and look at how collective action can help address systemic issues within the region. This Approved List is for the suitably qualified freelance consultants.

Risikoanalyse

Die Risikoanalyse ist für Ausschreibungen in diesem Land noch nicht verfügbar. Aktuell unterstützt: Estland, Lettland, Litauen, Polen, Frankreich, Großbritannien, Dänemark, Niederlande, Norwegen und Finnland.

Erfolgsstrategie

Erhalten Sie eine KI-gestützte Gewinnstrategie, die auf diese Ausschreibung zugeschnitten ist. Beinhaltet Gewinnwahrscheinlichkeits-Score, wichtige Chancen und Herausforderungen, empfohlene Schwerpunkte für Angebote, Einblicke in die Wettbewerbspositionierung und umsetzbare Empfehlungen zur Maximierung Ihrer Chancen.

Anmelden

Wettbewerber

Upgrade, um zu sehen, welche Unternehmen wahrscheinlich auf diese Ausschreibung bieten werden, basierend auf historischen Beschaffungsdaten.

Anmelden

Anforderungen & Qualifikationen

17 Anforderungen in 5 Kategorien

Einreichung (3)
Verpflichtend (1)
Konformität (3)
Technisch (9)
Finanziell (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-12-14 12:00:00.
--Applications must be for inclusion on an Approved List for freelance consultants.
--The submission must demonstrate how the bidder meets the criteria for a "suitably qualified freelance consultant" for SESLIP's objectives.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided tender information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The bidder must be a suitably qualified freelance consultant.
--The bidder must possess qualifications relevant to supporting Children's Services leadership and management.
--The bidder must be able to operate as a freelance entity/individual.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS9
--Demonstrate expertise in supporting political and professional leadership and management of local authority Children’s Services.
--Possess capability in developing Children’s Services as learning organisations.
--Ability to identify key strands of enquiry relevant to Children's Services improvement.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover, specific insurance levels) are detailed in the provided tender information.

Vorschau der Anforderungen

Registrieren Sie sich, um vollständige Anforderungen und Analysen anzuzeigen

Dokumente

3 Dokumente mit KI-Zusammenfassungen verfügbar

OCDS RecordDOC
030907-2021_ocds_record.json

Keine Zusammenfassung für dieses Dokument verfügbar.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
030907-2021_ocds_release.json

Keine Zusammenfassung für dieses Dokument verfügbar.

Official PDF VersionPDF
030907-2021_official.pdf

This document is a contract notice for an Approved List of suitably qualified freelance consultants to support the South East Children's Services Improvement Partnership (SESLIP) in developing Children's Services.

Vorschau der Dokumente

Registrieren Sie sich, um Dokumentenzusammenfassungen und Analysen anzuzeigen

71
Gut

Qualitätsbewertung der Ausschreibung

This tender for an Approved List of freelance consultants for Children's Services leadership support suffers from a critical lack of detailed documentation and explicit evaluation criteria, significantly hindering transparency and fair competition.

Bewertungsaufschlüsselung

Rechtliche Konformität100/100

The absence of detailed tender documents, specific mandatory exclusion grounds, and explicit evaluation criteria raises significant concerns regarding compliance with public procurement principles of transparency, equal treatment, and proportionality. While an 'Approved List' procedure allows for flexibility, the fundamental lack of documentation is problematic for a tender of this estimated value.

Absence of detailed tender documents
Lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds (beyond general statement)
Klarheit40/100

While the description of the service need is clear, the practical application of requirements for bidders is unclear due to the absence of supporting documents, detailed submission guidelines, and specific evaluation criteria. Bidders lack sufficient information on how their qualifications and capabilities will be objectively assessed.

Lack of detailed submission instructions
Ambiguity regarding how 'suitably qualified' and technical capabilities will be objectively assessed
Vollständigkeit83/100

The tender information provided is severely incomplete. Key elements such as full tender documents, detailed instructions for bidders, specific mandatory exclusion grounds, and, crucially, comprehensive evaluation criteria are missing. This makes it impossible for bidders to prepare a comprehensive and compliant submission.

Missing full tender documents
Absence of detailed evaluation criteria
Fairness80/100

The critical lack of detailed evaluation criteria and supporting tender documents creates a high risk of subjective assessment, potentially undermining the principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination. Without clear, predefined rules, it is difficult to ensure all bidders are judged on the same objective basis, raising concerns about potential for bias.

High risk of subjective evaluation due to missing criteria
Potential for unequal treatment without clear guidelines
Praktikabilität40/100

From a bidder's perspective, the tender is impractical due to the lack of essential information required to formulate a competitive and compliant bid. The contracting authority may also face significant challenges in objectively evaluating submissions without predefined criteria and a structured process, potentially leading to disputes or delays.

Bidders cannot adequately prepare without full documentation
Challenges for the contracting authority in conducting objective evaluation
Datenkonsistenz100/100

The provided data is internally consistent within its limited scope. However, the absence of full tender documents prevents a comprehensive assessment of data consistency across a complete tender package.

Nachhaltigkeit25/100

The tender description's focus on 'developing Children’s Services as learning organisations' and 'building leadership capacity' aligns with long-term service improvement. However, the tender lacks explicit green procurement or social criteria, which are increasingly important aspects of broader sustainability considerations in public procurement.

Absence of explicit green procurement criteria
Absence of explicit social criteria

Stärken

Clear identification of the service need and objectives (Children's Services improvement)
Open procedure type encourages broad participation
Focus on 'Innovation Focus' and 'Approved List' allows for flexibility and access to specialized expertise
Reasonable contract duration (61 months) for an Approved List
Estimated value disclosed

Bedenken

Critical absence of full tender documents and detailed evaluation criteria
High risk of subjective assessment due to vague requirements and missing evaluation methodology
Lack of specific mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed financial requirements creates uncertainty
Potential for reduced competition and legal challenges due to insufficient information for bidders
No explicit social or green procurement criteria, despite the nature of the service

Empfehlungen

1. Immediately publish comprehensive tender documents, including detailed instructions for bidders, specific mandatory exclusion grounds, and clear, objective evaluation criteria with scoring mechanisms.
2. Provide explicit guidance on how 'suitably qualified' and technical capabilities will be assessed to ensure transparency and fairness.
3. Consider incorporating relevant social and green procurement criteria where applicable to align with broader public policy objectives and enhance sustainability.

Vorschau der KI-Bewertung

Registrieren Sie sich, um vollständige Anforderungen und Analysen anzuzeigen

Vollständige Qualitätsbewertungsanalyse
Detaillierte Unterbewertungsaufschlüsselung
Einblicke in Stärken und Bedenken
Strategische Empfehlungen

Keine Kreditkarte erforderlich • Einrichtung in 2 Minuten

Zur Pipeline hinzufügen