Legal Compliance75/100
The absence of a defined procedure type, liable person, and explicit mandatory exclusion grounds are notable. However, CPV codes are appropriate, and deadlines for this EOI stage are reasonable, indicating a moderate level of compliance.
•Procedure type not defined
•Liable person missing
Clarity65/100
The project description and AI-extracted requirements are clear and detailed. However, the critical omission of evaluation criteria for shortlisting and the need to request the full information pack significantly reduce overall clarity for potential bidders.
•No evaluation criteria specified for shortlisting
•Full information pack not directly accessible
Completeness55/100
Key information such as the estimated value, formal procedure type, and liable person are missing. Crucially, the full tender documents and evaluation criteria are not directly provided, requiring a separate request, which is a major gap in completeness.
•Estimated value not disclosed
•Formal procedure type not defined
Fairness40/100
Significant concerns arise from the undisclosed estimated value, the complete absence of evaluation criteria, and the requirement to request full documents via email rather than direct public access. The lack of e-submission also impacts equal access and transparency.
•Estimated value not disclosed
•No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality50/100
The absence of electronic submission capabilities and direct URL access to tender documents creates practical barriers for potential bidders, making the process less efficient and user-friendly.
•No electronic submission supported
•No direct document URL provided
Data Consistency70/100
While core dates, CPV, and NUTS codes are consistent and logical, several key fields like procedure type, liable person, and estimated value are unpopulated or undisclosed, impacting overall data completeness and consistency.
•Key fields (Type, Procedure, Liable Person, Estimated Value) are unpopulated or undisclosed
Sustainability90/100
The tender is exceptionally strong in this area, with explicit focus on green skills, urban agriculture, social value, community engagement, and alignment with sustainability plans, demonstrating a high commitment to sustainable outcomes.