Connection of vehicle charging infrastructure at Mustakivi tee 13, Lasnamäe district, Tallinn, Harju county (LC3265)

This tender for car charging infrastructure connection demonstrates good clarity and data consistency, with clear requirements and evaluation criteria. However, concerns exist regarding fairness due to specific personnel registration requirements and a relatively high experience threshold, alongside a notable absence of explicit sustainability criteria.

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance, with reasonable submission deadlines (8 days), a clearly defined procedure type (VO - Väikehange) appropriate for the estimated value, and a relevant CPV code. Mandatory exclusion grounds are specified, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The tender appears to adhere to national procurement regulations for small procurements.

The tender's description is clear and unambiguous, and the AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and understandable. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as 100% lowest price, ensuring transparency. Performance conditions are clearly referenced via external links.

The tender provides all essential basic, financial, timeline, and classification information. Key requirements and evaluation criteria are defined, and location details are included. However, the content of critical documents like 'Väikehanke alusdokumendid' and 'Tööprojekt' could not be analyzed due to file format limitations, which prevents a full assessment of the tender's overall completeness from the provided data.

While the tender supports e-procurement and discloses the estimated value, several aspects raise fairness concerns. The requirement for key personnel to be registered in Elektrilevi's partner portal creates a barrier for new market entrants. Additionally, the technical capability requirement for one previous contract to be valued at least €40,000 is relatively high for a tender with an estimated value of €31,758.60, potentially limiting participation from smaller, yet competent, companies.

The tender supports electronic submission and clearly specifies the contract start date and work completion deadline. Detailed financing information, including payment terms and an optional factoring program, is provided. The duration of the work is also clearly stated.

All key fields are populated, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided for the timeline are logical and consistent. A minor inconsistency exists where the estimated value is disclosed, but the field 'Value Classified' is marked 'Yes'.

The tender explicitly lacks any stated green procurement, social, or innovation criteria, as confirmed by automated checks. While the project is EU funded, this does not translate into explicit sustainability requirements within the tender documentation itself.