Reconstruction of Läätsa Kalatööstus AS Substation

This tender for substation reconstruction demonstrates good clarity and completeness, with a transparent lowest-price evaluation criterion. However, the requirement for a 'manufacturer's certified partner' significantly raises concerns about fairness and potential restriction of competition.

The tender appears largely compliant with legal requirements, including reasonable deadlines, clear CPV codes, and defined exclusion grounds. The procedure type 'MS' is coded, indicating a defined national procedure. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

The project description is clear and unambiguous, and the requirements are well-documented and understandable. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as the lowest price, ensuring transparency.

All essential information, including title, reference, organization, financial details, timeline, and location, is provided. Five tender documents are attached and summarized, ensuring comprehensive information for bidders.

The requirement for bidders to 'Hold the status of a manufacturer's certified partner' is a significant concern, as it can severely limit competition and potentially tailor the tender to specific companies. While other aspects like e-procurement and objective evaluation criteria are positive, this specific requirement heavily impacts fairness.

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, enhancing accessibility. The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, providing practical information for potential bidders.

Key fields are consistently populated, and dates are logical and sequential. The only minor inconsistency is the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag appearing alongside the visible estimated value, which is likely a data entry quirk.

The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.