← Back to Tenders
Estonia10 days leftOpen

Purchase of therapeutic apheresis machine

Tender Overview

LOCATION

Estonia, Estonia

VALUE

€140,000

DEADLINE

February 12, 2026 at 10:00

CATEGORY

Supplies

CPV CODE

33100000-1

REFERENCE

305408

Project Timeline

▼

Contact Information

▼
View Original

Original Tender Description

Hanke eesmärk on sõlmida raamleping sihtasutusele Tartu Ülikooli Kliinikum ühe uue terapeutilise afereesi aparaadi ostmiseks koos 24 kuu pikkuse garantiiga ning seadmele garantiiperioodi järgse 8 aasta pikkuse ennetava hoolduse ja remonditööde tellimiseks 10 aastaks raamlepingu sõlmimisest arvates või kuni raamlepingu maksimaalse maksumuse täitumiseni, sõltuvalt sellest, kumb tingimus saabub varem.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • The tenderer, offered goods, subcontractors, and suppliers must not be subject to international and EU sanctions.
  • The tenderer must meet the exclusion criteria set by the contracting authority.
✓

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The tenderer must meet the qualification criteria set by the contracting authority.
  • For joint tenderers, a power of attorney must be submitted, authorizing one joint tenderer to represent all joint tenderers.
  • A power of attorney must be submitted for signing the tender if signed by an authorized person.
  • The tenderer must agree to all tender conditions.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The offered therapeutic apheresis device must comply with the detailed technical specifications and functional requirements outlined in "Lisa 1_Tehniline kirjeldus Afereesi_aparaat.docx".
  • The tenderer must describe the compliance of the offered device with the technical description and provide references to informational materials.
  • The subject of the procurement is a complete device together with the ordering of device-specific maintenance service.
  • The offered device must include warranty, maintenance, and training according to the framework agreement conditions.
  • The tenderer must adhere to environmental principles as per the draft framework agreement.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • The tender must include the cost of the device, installation cost, user training cost, warranty cost, post-warranty maintenance cost, and hourly rate for repair works.
  • The tender price is the sole evaluation criterion (100% weighting).
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • The tender must be submitted by 2026-02-12 10:00:00.
  • The European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) must be submitted.
  • The participation application form (Vorm III_Avaldus.docx) must be submitted.
  • For joint tenderers, the power of attorney for joint tenderers (Vorm I_Ühispakkujate volikiri.docx) must be submitted.
  • If the tender is signed by an authorized person, a power of attorney (Vorm II_Volikiri.docx) must be submitted.
  • Confirmations regarding the non-inclusion of offered goods, subcontractors, and suppliers under international and EU sanctions must be submitted.
  • The tender must describe the compliance of the offered device with the technical description and provide references to informational materials.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Vastavustingimused
Vastavusdeklaratsioon305408_vastavustingimused.pdf12.8 KB
Summary:
This document outlines tender submission and compliance conditions, including requirements for powers of attorney for joint bidders and bid signing, the application form for participation, and confirmations regarding international and EU sanctions on offered goods, subcontractors, and suppliers.
DOC
Lisa 1_Tehniline kirjeldus
Tehnilised SpetsifikatsioonidLisa 1_Tehniline kirjeldus Afereesi_apar...57.0 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the detailed technical specifications and functional requirements for the therapeutic apheresis device, requiring bidders to describe how their proposed equipment meets these conditions and provide references to supporting documentation.
DOC
Vorm III_Avaldus
Esitamise VormidVorm III_Avaldus.docx17.0 KB
Summary:
This form is a mandatory application for participation in the procurement procedure, where the bidder confirms their details and agreement with all tender conditions.
PDF
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad
Hindamiskriteeriumid305408_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf3.3 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the evaluation criteria for the therapeutic apheresis device procurement, where the total offer price (including device cost, installation, training, warranty, post-warranty maintenance, and repair hourly rate) is the sole evaluation criterion, weighted at 100%.
PDF
Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded305408_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitusteg...66.6 KB
Summary:
This document is an explanatory guide to the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), outlining the contracting authority's conditions for the procurement of a therapeutic apheresis machine, including qualification and exclusion criteria, but it is not for direct submission with the tender.
PDF
HD_Juhised pakkujale
Hanke TingimusedHD_Juhised pakkujale.pdf773.0 KB
Summary:
This document provides instructions for bidders participating in an open procurement procedure, outlining general conditions, the legal framework, and submission requirements for the purchase of a therapeutic apheresis device.
PDF
Lisa 2_Raamleping_afereesi_seadme_ost_ennetav_hooldus_remont
Lepingu MallLisa 2_Raamleping_afereesi_seadme_ost_en...426.9 KB
Summary:
This document is a draft framework agreement for the sale, maintenance, and repair of a therapeutic apheresis device, outlining the terms and conditions of the future contract, including device specifications, warranty, maintenance, training, and environmental principles.
PDF
Lisa 3_Isikuandmete töötlemise leping
Lepingu MallLisa 3_Isikuandmete töötlemise leping.pd...430.2 KB
Summary:
This document is a template for a personal data processing agreement, outlining the tenderer's (authorized processor) obligations and rights when processing personal data on behalf of the contracting authority (controller) in accordance with GDPR and Estonian data protection laws.
DOC
Vorm II_Volikiri
VolikiriVorm II_Volikiri.docx16.1 KB
Summary:
This form is a power of attorney authorizing a designated individual to represent the bidder and sign the tender offer for the procurement of a therapeutic apheresis device.
DOC
Vorm I_Ühispakkujate volikiri
VolikiriVorm I_Ühispakkujate volikiri.docx13.3 KB
Summary:
This document is a power of attorney for joint bidders, authorizing one joint bidder to represent all joint bidders in submitting the tender and fulfilling the contract.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured and transparent, particularly regarding evaluation criteria, but it presents minor inconsistencies in data and limited scope for sustainability criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender generally complies with legal requirements, with a reasonable submission deadline and clearly defined procedure type. A minor inconsistency exists between the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag and the disclosed estimated value.

•Inconsistency between 'Value Classified: Yes' and the provision of an estimated value.
Clarity80/100

The description, requirements, and evaluation criteria are clear and unambiguous, with the 100% price-based evaluation being highly transparent. AI-extracted requirements are well-structured.

Completeness70/100

Basic information and required documents are present. However, the content of the XML-formatted ESPD document could not be analyzed, potentially obscuring details. The 'Value Classified' inconsistency also slightly impacts financial clarity.

•Content of XML-formatted ESPD document not analyzed, potentially hiding completeness issues.
•Minor inconsistency in 'Value Classified' status.
Fairness85/100

Evaluation criteria are objective and transparent (100% price). E-procurement is supported, and requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company, with a reasonable justification for not dividing the procurement.

Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is supported, and duration is clearly specified. However, a precise contract start date (beyond 'from framework agreement signing') and detailed financing information are not explicitly provided.

•Absence of a precise contract start date.
•Lack of detailed financing information (e.g., specific funding source).
Data Consistency90/100

Data is largely consistent across key fields and dates. The primary inconsistency is the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag despite the estimated value being provided.

•Inconsistency between 'Value Classified: Yes' and the provision of an estimated value.
Sustainability50/100

The draft framework agreement mentions adherence to environmental principles, which is a positive step. However, the tender lacks specific green procurement criteria, social aspects, or an innovation focus.

•Lack of specific green procurement criteria beyond general environmental principles.
•Absence of explicit social aspects or innovation focus.

Strengths

Clear and objective evaluation criteria (100% price weighting).
Comprehensive documentation, including draft contract and technical specifications.
Full support for electronic submission and e-procurement.
Detailed description of the procurement object and its duration.
Explicit mention of environmental principles in the draft framework agreement.

Concerns

Inconsistency regarding 'Value Classified: Yes' despite an estimated value being provided.
The content of the international ESPD (XML format) was not fully analyzed, potentially hiding details.
Lack of specific green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation focus beyond general environmental principles.
Absence of a precise contract start date, only 'from framework agreement signing'.

Recommendations

1. Clarify the 'Value Classified' status when an estimated value is already disclosed to avoid ambiguity.
2. Ensure all critical documents, especially international standard forms like ESPD, are in an easily accessible and analyzable format.
3. Integrate more explicit and measurable green, social, and innovation criteria into future tenders to enhance sustainability.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
75/ 100 · Good
→

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes