Publication and distribution of Rae Sõnumid

This tender for the publication and distribution of "Rae Sõnumid" is well-structured and clear, providing comprehensive documentation and transparent evaluation criteria. While strong in legal compliance, clarity, and fairness, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations.

The tender demonstrates high legal compliance, adhering to national procurement law (RHS) and utilizing standard EU tools like ESPD. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes or suspensions are noted. Standard clauses for rejecting tenders are appropriately included.

The tender exhibits excellent clarity. The service description is precise, requirements are detailed across multiple documents (technical specifications, portfolio conditions), and evaluation criteria are explicitly stated with clear weighting and sub-criteria for the portfolio. Performance conditions are also well-defined.

The tender is largely complete, providing all essential basic information, detailed requirements, and supporting documents. The slight ambiguity in 'Location Info' (Täpne piirkond määramata) is a minor point given the local nature of the service.

The tender appears fair, with the estimated value disclosed, reasonable deadlines for preparation, and e-procurement enabled. Evaluation criteria, including the subjective portfolio assessment, are clearly outlined, promoting transparency. There is no indication of requirements being tailored to a specific company.

The tender is practical, supporting electronic submission and providing clear financing terms and contract duration. While the exact contract start date is not fixed, the mechanism for handling potential delays is a practical approach. Document accessibility is implied through the e-procurement system.

Data consistency is high, with all key fields populated and logical dates. A minor inconsistency exists where 'Estimated Value: 216,000.00 EUR' is followed by 'Value Classified: Yes', but the value is clearly disclosed.

This tender lacks explicit sustainability considerations. There are no mentioned criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, nor is it EU funded, which often entails higher sustainability standards.