Reconstruction of Puiga School Building

This tender for the reconstruction of Puiga school building demonstrates strong legal compliance, clarity, and fairness, particularly through its use of e-procurement and transparent evaluation criteria. However, the lack of explicit sustainability considerations and the inability to analyze key technical and contractual documents due to format limitations are notable areas for improvement.

The tender exhibits high legal compliance, utilizing the ESPD, clearly defining the procedure type, and assigning appropriate CPV codes. The inclusion of an 'or equivalent' clause for technical specifications and detailed subcontractor control conditions further strengthens its adherence to national and EU procurement regulations.

The tender's description is clear, and requirements are well-documented and understandable, including specific submission forms and a mandatory site visit. The evaluation criteria, based solely on the lowest total cost, are exceptionally clear and unambiguous.

While all basic information, deadlines, and financial details are provided, the inability to access and analyze the content of several crucial documents (e.g., contract project, interior design project, expertise) due to unsupported file formats (zip, asice) limits a full assessment of the tender package's completeness from the provided data.

The tender demonstrates strong fairness through its disclosed value, reasonable preparation time, objective 100% cost-based evaluation criteria, and support for e-procurement. The 'or equivalent' clause ensures that technical requirements are not tailored to specific companies.

Electronic submission is fully supported, and the duration is clearly specified. However, an explicit document URL was not provided in the summary, and the contract start date is not explicitly stated beyond the duration from contract signing, which could be clearer.

All key fields are consistently populated, and dates are logical and coherent. There are no detected suspensions or disputes, indicating a well-managed and consistent data set.

The tender lacks explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, as indicated by automated checks. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability goals into the procurement process.