← Back to Tenders
Estonia7 days leftOpen

Rapla County, Märjamaa Municipality, Reconstruction of Valgu-Velise feeder (IP7059)

Tender Overview

ORGANIZATION

Elektrilevi OÜ

LOCATION

Estonia, Estonia

VALUE

€376,500

DEADLINE

February 09, 2026 at 11:00

CATEGORY

Construction

CPV CODE

45310000-3

REFERENCE

305110

Project Timeline

▼

Contact Information

▼
View Original

Original Tender Description

Hange on välja kuulutatud: Rapla maakond, Märjamaa vald, Valgu-Velise fiidri rekonstrueerimine (IP7059). Ehitada vastavalt projektile ja lisatingimustele. Tööde teostamise tähtaeg on 16.10.2026. - BLL ja MVL LP17288 ELV poolt. BLL tarne 30 päeva jooksul alates ehitaja tellimuse soovist. Tellija poolt hangitavate seadmete ja materjalide transport ning sellega kaasnevad kulud Tellija tarnepartnerilt objektile kuuluvad Töövõtja töö mahtu; - Arvestid annab ELV. Teavitada vajadusest kaks nädalat ette; - Tähelepanu pöörata töö mahtude tabeli täiendavatele märkustele (arvestada pakkumuse tegemisel)! Võimalusel ja vajadusel võib lepingu sõlmida ja tööde teostamise/teenuste tellimisega alustada enne hanke kohta üldandmetes avaldatud lepingu kehtivuse eeldatavat algusaega. Hankemenetluse kulgemise pikenemisel üle selle aja võib lepingu sõlmida ja selle täitmisega alustada ka peale üldandmetes avaldatud lepingu kehtivuse eeldatavat algusaega.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • The tenderer must not be subject to mandatory exclusion grounds.
  • The tenderer must not be subject to voluntary exclusion grounds (if applied by the contracting authority).
  • The tenderer must confirm that no exclusion grounds apply to them.
✓

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The tenderer must confirm compliance with the basic documents.
  • The tenderer must have personnel with switching rights and responsibility for work operations.
  • The tenderer must have an A-competent electrical works manager.
  • The tenderer must familiarize themselves with the object and project before submitting the bid.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The tenderer must have an A-competent electrical works manager.
  • The tenderer must have personnel with switching rights and responsibility for work operations.
  • The tenderer must submit a list of at least three similar electrical construction contracts successfully completed within the last 60 months.
  • At least one of the submitted contracts must be valued over 80,000 EUR.
  • The tenderer must submit a work execution plan.
  • The tenderer must take responsibility for damages.
  • The tenderer must ensure notification of property owners.
  • The tenderer must fulfill the notification obligation for relay protection settings.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • The bid must include a total cost, which is the sole evaluation criterion (100%).
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • The bid must include a confirmation that no exclusion grounds apply to the tenderer.
  • The bid must include a confirmation of compliance with the basic documents.
  • The bid must include a cost table.
  • The bid must include all necessary materials.
  • The bid must include a work execution plan.
  • The bid must include a list of at least three similar electrical construction contracts successfully completed within the last 60 months, with at least one valued over 80,000 EUR.
  • The tenderer must grant permission for inquiries regarding contract performance.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Vastavustingimused
Hanke Tingimused305110_vastavustingimused.pdf9.5 KB
Summary:
This document specifies the conditions for submitting a tender, requiring bidders to confirm compliance with base documents, submit a cost table, possess personnel with switching rights and designated work operation responsibility, and have an A-competent electrical work supervisor.
DOC
Vorm. Varasemate hankelepingute informatsioon (01.06.2022)
ViitedVarasemate hankelepingute informatsioon ...22.3 KB
Summary:
Bidders must submit a list of at least three similar electricity construction contracts successfully completed within the last 60 months, with at least one valued over 80,000 EUR, and grant permission for reference checks regarding contract performance.
PDF
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad
Hindamiskriteeriumid305110_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf3.0 KB
Summary:
This document specifies that the sole evaluation criterion for bids is the total bid cost (100%), with the lowest-priced bid being deemed the most economically advantageous.
PDF
Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimused
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded305110_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitse...9.6 KB
Summary:
This document outlines mandatory and voluntary exclusion grounds and qualification conditions that bidders must meet to participate in the procurement process, requiring confirmation that no exclusion grounds apply to the bidder.
DOC
IP7059 Lisatingimused
Hanke TingimusedIP7059 Lisatingimused.docx18.7 KB
Summary:
This document outlines additional conditions for the IP7059 Valgu-Velise I stage reconstruction project, requiring contractors to inspect the site and project before bidding, include all necessary materials, submit a work plan, notify property owners, take responsibility for damages, and provide advance notice for relay protection settings.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

66
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for electrical feeder reconstruction demonstrates good foundational information and clear requirements for technical capability. However, significant inconsistencies regarding evaluation criteria and the inaccessibility of crucial detailed documents for analysis present notable concerns for clarity and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender generally complies with national regulations for a simplified procedure, and the CPV code is appropriate. Deadlines are reasonable. However, the contradiction between 'relative_weighting' and 'total bid cost (100%)' for evaluation criteria introduces a legal risk.

•Contradiction in evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting' vs. 'total bid cost (100%)').
Clarity65/100

The general description and AI-extracted requirements are clear. However, the major contradiction in evaluation criteria significantly reduces clarity. Furthermore, the inability to analyze crucial detailed documents (project, work volumes) means their clarity cannot be fully assessed.

•Major contradiction in evaluation criteria.
•Crucial detailed documents (project, work volumes, basic documents) are not summarized/analyzed.
Completeness60/100

Basic information, deadlines, value, and location are well-defined. However, the inability to access or summarize four crucial tender documents (basic documents, work volume table, project, cost table) prevents a full assessment of the tender's completeness, as key details are likely contained within them.

•Four crucial tender documents (.zip, .xls) are not summarized/analyzed, hindering full completeness assessment.
Fairness70/100

The tender supports e-procurement and discloses the estimated value. Requirements for experience and personnel are standard and appear generic. However, the conflicting evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting' vs. 'total bid cost (100%)') creates ambiguity that could compromise the objectivity and transparency of the evaluation process, impacting fairness.

•Conflicting evaluation criteria could compromise objectivity and transparency.
Practicality75/100

Electronic submission is supported, and a contract start date and work completion deadline are specified. Detailed financing conditions, including varying payment terms and a factoring option, are provided. While the factoring option offers flexibility, the 95-day payment term could be less practical for some bidders.

•Extended payment terms (95 days with factoring) might pose cash flow challenges for some contractors.
Data Consistency60/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there is a significant inconsistency regarding the evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting' vs. 'total bid cost (100%)'). A minor inconsistency exists with 'Value Classified: Yes' despite the value being explicitly stated.

•Major inconsistency in evaluation criteria.
•Minor inconsistency with 'Value Classified: Yes' when value is disclosed.
Sustainability30/100

The tender is noted as EU Funded, which often implies higher standards. However, the automated check and provided content indicate a lack of explicit green procurement, social criteria, or innovation focus within the tender requirements themselves.

•No explicit green procurement criteria.
•No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear basic information and project description.
Well-defined eligibility and technical capability requirements.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Detailed financial payment conditions provided.
Reasonable experience requirements for similar contracts.

Concerns

Major inconsistency in evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting' vs. 'total bid cost (100%)').
Crucial tender documents (project, work volumes, basic documents) are not summarized/analyzed.
Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Payment terms, especially the 95-day factoring option, could be challenging for cash flow.
Minor data inconsistency regarding 'Value Classified'.

Recommendations

1. Immediately clarify and correct the conflicting evaluation criteria to ensure fairness and legal compliance.
2. Ensure all critical tender documents are accessible and their content is clearly summarized or directly provided in an analyzable format.
3. Integrate explicit sustainability, social, or innovation requirements, especially given the 'EU Funded' characteristic.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
66/ 100 · Good
→

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes