Inventory of protected species in Alutaguse National Park (new water intake area)

This tender for a protected species inventory in Alutaguse National Park is generally well-structured and compliant, benefiting from clear requirements and an objective evaluation criterion. However, it could improve by explicitly stating the contract duration and start date for better bidder planning.

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance with reasonable deadlines, a clearly defined procedure type (VO), appropriate CPV codes, and no detected disputes. The use of ESPD and electronic submission aligns with EU/national regulations. A more specific reference to the national legal basis for the VO procedure would enhance transparency.

The tender's description is clear, and requirements are well-documented and understandable, categorized effectively by the AI. Evaluation criteria are explicitly defined as the lowest price, ensuring transparency. Performance conditions are outlined in the terms of reference and draft contract.

Most essential information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, and estimated value, is provided. All relevant documents are attached and summarized. However, the explicit contract duration is not clearly stated in the provided summaries, which is a significant piece of information for potential bidders.

The tender exhibits strong fairness, offering full document access, disclosing the estimated value, and setting reasonable deadlines. Evaluation criteria are objective and transparent (lowest price). E-procurement ensures equal access, and requirements appear generic, not tailored to a specific company. A minor inconsistency exists with 'Value Classified: Yes' when the value is disclosed.

Electronic submission is supported, enhancing practicality. However, the absence of an explicit contract start date and duration in the summaries reduces the practicality for bidders in terms of planning and resource allocation. Document URLs are not explicitly provided but are assumed to be accessible via the e-procurement system.

Data consistency is high, with most key fields populated and logical dates. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The only minor inconsistency is the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag appearing despite the estimated value being explicitly disclosed.

While the subject matter (inventory of protected species) is inherently environmental, the tender documents do not explicitly include additional green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation focus beyond the core task. The tender is EU-funded, which often implies higher standards, but specific sustainability criteria are not detailed.