Legal Compliance100/100
The tender is labelled as an "Open procedure" but lacks fundamental elements like explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and a full tender pack, which are typically required for formal compliance. The use of a Microsoft Forms questionnaire for submission is unusual for a formal open procedure.
•No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds mentioned.
•No documents attached (Tender Pack not issued).
Clarity40/100
While the service description is clear, the tender's overall clarity is compromised by the absence of the crucial ABP Track Standard and the full "Tender Pack," which are stated as "to be issued." This creates ambiguity regarding the complete scope and requirements.
•Crucial ABP Track Standard (ABP-ENGC-ST-022) not yet issued.
•Full "Tender Pack" not yet issued.
Completeness75/100
The tender is significantly incomplete for an "Open procedure," lacking essential documents, evaluation criteria, explicit financial requirements, and mandatory exclusion grounds. The estimated value is also not disclosed.
•No documents attached (Tender Pack not issued).
•Missing evaluation criteria.
Fairness40/100
Assessing fairness is challenging due to the absence of a full tender pack and evaluation criteria. The current setup, relying on an initial questionnaire, does not provide sufficient information for potential bidders to fully understand the competitive landscape or the basis for selection.
•Absence of full tender documentation and evaluation criteria hinders fair assessment.
•Reliance on an initial questionnaire may not provide equal information access for all bidders.
Practicality40/100
The initial submission via Microsoft Forms is practical for the contracting authority's preliminary screening. However, the lack of the ABP Track Standard upfront makes it impractical for bidders to thoroughly assess their capabilities and prepare a comprehensive response.
•Lack of ABP Track Standard upfront makes it difficult for bidders to assess capability.
•Submission via Microsoft Forms may lack the formality and auditability of a dedicated e-procurement platform for a full tender.
Data Consistency100/100
There is an inconsistency between the stated "Open procedure" type and the current stage of the procurement, which more closely resembles an Expression of Interest or Request for Information due to the limited information and submission method.
•Inconsistency between "Open procedure" label and the current EOI/RFI-like stage.
Sustainability0/100
The provided tender information does not include any explicit green procurement or social criteria, indicating a lack of emphasis on sustainability aspects in this publication.
•No explicit green procurement criteria.
•No explicit social criteria.