Framework agreement for the assessment, maintenance, and felling of tall greenery in Tori municipality

The tender for Tori municipality's high greenery services is generally well-structured and transparent, particularly regarding evaluation criteria and e-procurement. While it explicitly includes green procurement, it lacks specific social or innovation aspects, and some minor details in basic information could be clearer.

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance, utilizing the ESPD and adhering to standard procurement practices. Deadlines are reasonable, and the CPV code is appropriate. However, the 'Type' and 'Procedure' codes being 'N/A' represent a minor lack of clarity in formal classification.

The tender's description, requirements, and evaluation criteria are clearly articulated. The AI-extracted requirements are well-categorized and specific, making the tender understandable for potential bidders. Evaluation is solely based on price, which is highly transparent.

All essential information, including title, reference, organization, financial details, timeline, and location, is provided. A comprehensive set of 11 documents supports the tender. However, the inability to analyze the XML ESPD content and the 'N/A' codes for Type/Procedure slightly impact the perceived completeness.

Fairness is high due to full document access, disclosed estimated value, reasonable preparation time, and objective, price-based evaluation criteria. E-procurement is enabled, and technical requirements, such as arborist certification, appear generic and relevant to the service, not tailored to a specific company. Reliance on third-party capabilities is also permitted.

The tender supports electronic submission and provides a platform URL. Contract duration is specified. However, the exact contract start date is not explicitly stated, and while an estimated value is given, specific financing information beyond that is not detailed.

Data consistency is strong, with most key fields populated and logical dates. There are no detected disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include the 'N/A' codes for Type/Procedure and the phrasing 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside a disclosed estimated value.

The tender explicitly identifies as 'Green Procurement,' which is a positive aspect. However, it lacks specific mention of social criteria or an innovation focus, and it is not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.