Construction of the training building for wind turbine mechanics at Kuressaare Vocational School

This tender demonstrates strong clarity and completeness in its documentation and requirements, ensuring bidders have a comprehensive understanding of the project. While generally fair and legally compliant, there are minor inconsistencies and areas for improvement in data consistency and the integration of broader sustainability aspects.

The tender exhibits good legal compliance, adhering to national (RHS) and EU (ESPD) regulations. Deadlines are reasonable, CPV codes are appropriate, and there are no detected disputes or suspensions. The procedure type 'A' is generally understood, despite a missing specific code.

The tender documentation is exceptionally clear, with a precise project description, well-defined and categorized requirements, and explicit evaluation criteria (85% price, 15% work plan). Performance conditions are also clearly outlined in the draft contract.

All essential information, including project details, financial aspects, timelines, and location, is comprehensively provided. The extensive set of 15 supporting documents, each with a content summary, further enhances the tender's completeness.

The tender generally promotes fairness through transparent evaluation criteria and enabled e-procurement. However, the mandatory physical site visit (RHS § 111 lg 6) and the decision not to divide the tender into lots, despite justification, could potentially limit broader participation. A minor inconsistency exists with 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside a disclosed estimated value.

Electronic submission is well-supported, enhancing practicality. However, the lack of a definitive contract start date (stated as presumptive with no legal meaning) and the absence of a direct document URL (though documents are accessible via the e-procurement system) present minor practical limitations.

While most data fields are consistently populated and dates are logical, a significant inconsistency exists with the direct contradiction between the disclosed 'Estimated Value: 4,000,000.00 EUR' and the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag.

The tender explicitly includes 'Green Procurement' and is 'EU Funded,' which are positive aspects. However, the absence of specific social criteria and an innovation focus significantly limits its overall sustainability score, as flagged by automated checks.