Leisure Member Bespoke Customer Journey Communication System

This tender presents significant deficiencies in critical areas such as evaluation criteria and e-submission, severely impacting fairness and clarity. While basic information is present, the lack of detailed requirements and sustainability focus indicates a moderate to poor quality procurement process.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code appropriately, and no disputes are reported. However, the absence of specific mandatory exclusion grounds is a significant legal omission. The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag contradicts the disclosed estimated value, indicating a data inconsistency, and the tender's reveal date is missing.

The overall description of the project's aim is clear. However, the tender critically lacks specified evaluation criteria, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be judged. The AI-extracted requirements are high-level, and detailed performance conditions are not explicitly stated.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, and duration are provided. Documents are attached. However, the tender is incomplete regarding specific financial requirements and, most critically, evaluation criteria. The reveal date is also missing.

The tender suffers from significant fairness issues due to the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria, which undermines transparency and objectivity. Furthermore, the lack of electronic submission (e-submission) creates a practical barrier to equal access for all potential bidders.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the absence of electronic submission is a major practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders. A direct document URL is not explicitly provided in the summary.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. However, the 'Liable Person' field is empty, and there is a direct contradiction between 'Value Classified: Yes' and the explicit disclosure of the estimated value.

The tender does not include any explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.