WE_670- Georgia Security Services

This tender for security services is generally well-structured with clear basic information and electronic submission, but suffers from a critical lack of specified evaluation criteria and detailed financial requirements.

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV code, and provides OCDS data, indicating good compliance. No disputes or suspensions are noted. The absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds in the summary is a minor detail, assuming they are present in the full tender documents.

The service description is clear, and some requirements are understandable. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed financial requirements significantly reduces the overall clarity for potential bidders.

Most basic information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, and duration, is provided. Documents are attached and summarized. However, the tender lacks explicit evaluation criteria and detailed financial requirements, impacting its completeness.

The tender discloses the estimated value and supports electronic submission, which promotes equal access. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria makes the process opaque and potentially unfair, as bidders cannot objectively assess how their proposals will be judged.

Electronic submission is supported via a supplier portal, and key dates like contract start and duration are clearly specified. The absence of a direct document URL in the provided summary is a minor practical drawback, assuming documents are accessible through the portal.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there is a notable inconsistency in the estimated value and currency between the basic information (EUR) and one of the document summaries (GBP).

The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, which is common for basic service tenders but indicates a lack of emphasis in this area.