Supply and installation of water consumption meters

This tender for the supply and installation of water meters is generally well-structured with clear basic information, but restricted document access significantly impacts fairness and completeness. While evaluation criteria are specified, the tender lacks explicit sustainability or innovation focus.

Legal compliance is generally good, with an open procedure, reasonable deadlines, and a correctly assigned CPV code. However, the vague 'Liable Person' contact and the flagged 'Restricted document access' could pose minor compliance risks regarding full transparency.

The tender description, performance conditions, and evaluation criteria (lowest price) are clearly stated in the document summaries. While AI-extracted requirements are generic, the full documents appear to contain necessary detail.

Most essential information, including title, organization, value, duration, and key deadlines, is provided. However, the flagged 'Restricted document access' is a significant concern, as it implies that full tender documents may not be readily available to all potential bidders, impacting overall completeness.

The tender benefits from an open procedure, disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and objective 'lowest price' evaluation criteria. However, the critical issue of 'Restricted document access' severely undermines fairness by potentially limiting equal access to essential information for all bidders.

Electronic submission is supported, enhancing practicality. However, the lack of a specific contract start date and the 'Restricted document access' (implying difficulty in obtaining documents) reduce the overall practicality for bidders.

Key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Initial conflicting flags regarding e-submission and evaluation criteria were reconciled by prioritizing detailed document summaries and explicit characteristics.

The tender does not include any specific criteria related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, nor is it indicated as EU-funded. This is common for standard procurements but results in a low score for this category.