Legal Compliance75/100
The procedure type and CPV code are clearly defined, and no disputes or suspensions are noted. While the reveal date is missing, the submission period from today's date appears reasonable. The tender seems to comply with national regulations for below-threshold procurements.
•Missing tender reveal date
Clarity65/100
The service description is clear and unambiguous, and potential risks related to local government reorganisation are well-articulated. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria in the provided information significantly reduces clarity for potential bidders.
•Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100
Basic information, deadlines, estimated value, and contract duration are all specified. Documents are listed and summarized. The primary deficiency is the explicit lack of evaluation criteria and the requirement to express interest to gain full access to tender documentation.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•Full tender documentation not immediately public
Fairness55/100
While document access is available upon expressing interest and requirements do not appear tailored, the absence of disclosed evaluation criteria is a significant barrier to fair and transparent competition. The currency discrepancy also introduces a minor fairness concern.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•Currency inconsistency for estimated value
Practicality80/100
Electronic submission is clearly supported via the Suffolk Sourcing e-tendering system, and key contract dates (start, duration) are provided. The lack of a direct public URL to the tender documents is a minor inconvenience.
•No direct public URL to tender documents
Data Consistency60/100
The most significant inconsistency is the discrepancy between the estimated value stated as EUR in the basic information and GBP in the description. Minor inconsistencies include empty codes for the procedure type and a missing liable person.
•Currency inconsistency for estimated value (EUR vs GBP)
•Empty codes for procedure type
Sustainability20/100
There is no explicit mention or integration of green procurement principles, social aspects, or innovation focus within the provided tender information.
•No green procurement focus
•No social criteria