Processing of Sweepings Waste

This tender presents a generally clear scope of work and reasonable timeline, but is significantly hampered by a lack of detailed evaluation criteria and the absence of electronic submission capabilities, impacting fairness and practicality.

The tender defines an Open procedure and uses an appropriate CPV code. The 29-day submission period is reasonable for an open procedure. No disputes or suspensions are noted. However, the reveal date is not explicitly provided, which is a minor disclosure gap.

While the service description and AI-extracted requirements are clear, the tender significantly lacks detailed evaluation criteria, including weightings or specific sub-criteria for price, quality, and social value. This omission creates ambiguity for potential bidders regarding how their proposals will be assessed.

Most essential information such as title, organization, value, duration, and deadlines are present. However, the critical absence of detailed evaluation criteria and the missing reveal date reduce its overall completeness, making it harder for bidders to formulate a fully compliant proposal.

The tender discloses the estimated value and appears to have generic requirements, not tailored to a specific company. However, the lack of detailed and transparent evaluation criteria significantly hinders fairness by making the assessment process opaque. Furthermore, the absence of electronic submission capabilities creates an unnecessary barrier to equal access and modern procurement practices.

The tender specifies the contract start date and duration. A major practical drawback is the lack of electronic submission, which can complicate the bidding process for potential suppliers and increase administrative burden. The document URL is not explicitly provided in the summary.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are consistent and populated. Minor inconsistencies include missing information for the 'Liable Person', the 'Type Code' for the procedure, and the 'reveal date'. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

The tender explicitly includes 'social value' as an award criterion, which is a positive step towards social sustainability. However, it lacks explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, environmental considerations, or innovation, limiting its overall sustainability ambition.