Reactive Repair & Maintenance of CCTV, Fire Alarm and Intruder Alarm Systems (Including the Provision of an Alarm Monitoring Service)

This tender presents a moderately complete and clear opportunity for reactive repair and maintenance services, but significant concerns exist regarding the absence of disclosed estimated value and, critically, specified evaluation criteria, which impact fairness and transparency.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes appropriately, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The submission deadline is reasonable. However, the summary lacks specific mandatory exclusion grounds, which are typically a legal requirement, and the undisclosed estimated value could be a transparency concern depending on national regulations.

The description of the required services and technical capabilities is clear and unambiguous. However, the tender's clarity is significantly hampered by the explicit absence of specified evaluation criteria and the lack of detailed eligibility and financial requirements in the provided summaries.

Basic information, duration, and document availability are present. However, the tender is incomplete due to the undisclosed estimated value and, most critically, the absence of evaluation criteria, eligibility requirements, and financial requirements in the provided summaries.

The open procedure and mention of e-procurement (despite a contradiction in automated checks) suggest an intent for fair access. However, the undisclosed estimated value reduces transparency, and the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria severely undermines the fairness and objectivity of the procurement process.

The contract duration is clearly specified. However, the practicality is reduced by the ambiguity surrounding e-submission support (contradictory information), the lack of an explicit document URL in the basic information, and the absence of a contract start date and financing details (estimated value).

Key dates are logical, and the status is active with no disputes. However, there are minor inconsistencies such as missing codes for the procedure type and an empty 'Liable Person' field. A significant inconsistency exists between the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the 'No e-submission' automated check.

The tender positively includes social aspects through the requirement for 'Community Benefit Points'. However, it lacks explicit focus on green procurement or innovation, limiting its overall sustainability profile.