Legal Compliance100/100
The use of an Open procedure is legally compliant. However, the lack of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided information is a concern, as these are typically required by public procurement regulations.
•Missing detailed mandatory exclusion grounds.
Clarity40/100
The description of the services and the division into three distinct lots is clear. However, the overall clarity of expectations for bidders is low due to the absence of detailed evaluation criteria, technical specifications, and specific financial requirements.
•Lack of detailed evaluation criteria.
•Absence of specific technical specifications beyond general descriptions.
Completeness83/100
The tender information is critically incomplete due to the stated absence of any attached documents and content. The 'extracted requirements' are high-level summaries, lacking essential details such as comprehensive evaluation criteria, specific financial requirements, and detailed technical specifications for the services.
•Critical absence of full tender documents.
•Missing detailed evaluation criteria.
Fairness60/100
The Open procedure and the allowance for multiple suppliers per lot (1-6) and bidding for any combination of lots generally promote competition and fairness. However, the significant lack of detailed evaluation criteria could lead to subjective assessment, potentially undermining fairness.
•Potential for subjective evaluation due to missing detailed criteria.
Practicality40/100
The establishment of a framework agreement with multiple suppliers per lot is a practical approach for securing ongoing specialized conservation and binding services. The division into lots based on treatment types is also practical for matching supplier expertise. The use of an eSourcing portal for submission is efficient.
Data Consistency100/100
The information provided within the extracted content is consistent and does not contain contradictions.
Sustainability0/100
There is no mention of environmental, social, or innovation criteria within the provided tender information. This indicates a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability principles into the procurement process.
•Absence of sustainability criteria (environmental, social, innovation).