Legal Compliance100/100
The tender appears to follow an Open procedure, which is generally compliant. However, the absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and specific legal requirements in the provided extract makes a full assessment difficult.
•Absence of specific mandatory exclusion grounds details
•Lack of full tender documentation to verify legal compliance of all terms
Clarity40/100
The overall purpose and scope of services are clear at a high level. However, the lack of detailed requirements, evaluation criteria, and full tender documents means that specific expectations for bidders are highly unclear.
•Vague eligibility and technical capability requirements
•Absence of detailed service specifications
Completeness83/100
This is the weakest area. The provided information is severely incomplete, lacking any actual tender documents, detailed specifications, evaluation criteria, or comprehensive financial and technical requirements.
•No tender documents attached or content available
•Missing detailed service specifications
Fairness60/100
The Open procedure is inherently fair, but the extreme lack of detailed information and evaluation criteria could lead to an unfair or opaque selection process. Without clear criteria, subjective judgments are more likely, potentially favoring incumbents.
•Lack of clear and objective evaluation criteria
•Potential for subjective assessment due to vague requirements
Practicality40/100
The concept of a framework agreement for these services is practical. However, the current level of detail makes it impractical for potential bidders to prepare a high-quality, compliant submission. The absence of documents means bidders don't know how to bid.
•Impractical for bidders to prepare comprehensive proposals without detailed tender documents
•Unclear what specific evidence or information is required for eligibility and technical capability
Data Consistency100/100
The provided data is internally consistent, but its limited scope makes this assessment less impactful.
Sustainability25/100
'Social Criteria' is mentioned as a characteristic, which is a positive indicator for sustainability. However, without detailed tender documents, it's impossible to assess how these criteria are integrated or evaluated.
•Lack of detailed information on how 'Social Criteria' will be assessed or weighted
•No explicit mention of environmental or economic sustainability aspects beyond social criteria