Grounds Maintenance

This tender suffers from significant deficiencies, primarily the absence of critical tender documents and evaluation criteria, severely impacting clarity, completeness, fairness, and practicality for potential bidders.

The tender defines the procedure type and assigns CPV/NUTS codes. No disputes are noted. However, the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided information is a legal oversight. The missing reveal date makes it impossible to verify the full legal compliance regarding the tender period, though the submission deadline itself is not flagged as a concern per instructions.

The general description of the grounds maintenance work is clear. However, the tender critically lacks specified evaluation criteria, and the detailed specification document, which is stated to contain the full scope of works, is inaccessible. This significantly reduces the overall clarity for bidders regarding expectations and how their proposals will be judged.

Basic information, financial details, and timeline are present. However, the tender is severely incomplete due to the absence of specified evaluation criteria. Furthermore, three out of seven listed tender documents, including the crucial 'specification for these works,' are inaccessible ('Page not found' errors), rendering the tender fundamentally incomplete for any serious bidder.

The estimated value is disclosed, and the high-level requirements appear generic. However, the fairness is severely compromised by the complete absence of evaluation criteria, making the assessment process opaque and subjective. The inability to access key tender documents, particularly the detailed specification, creates an unequal playing field. The lack of e-submission further limits equal access for all potential bidders.

The contract start date and duration are known, and financing information is available. However, the practicality of participating in this tender is very low due to the critical issue of inaccessible tender documents (multiple 'Page not found' errors). Without the detailed specification, bidders cannot practically prepare a compliant and competitive offer. The absence of electronic submission also adds an unnecessary practical burden.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, description, deadlines, and value are consistently populated. There are no noted disputes or suspensions. The estimated value in EUR aligns logically with the stated annual GBP range over the contract duration.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement aspects, social criteria, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards. Therefore, sustainability considerations appear to be absent from this procurement.