Legal Compliance100/100
The tender outlines standard certifications (ISO, CE) but critically omits mandatory exclusion grounds. The specific UK-centric requirements for sustainability and cyber security, while laudable, might inadvertently create barriers for international bidders not familiar with these frameworks.
•Mandatory exclusion grounds are not specified.
•Potential for indirect discrimination against international bidders due to highly specific UK-centric requirements (MSAT, Evergreen, PPN 006, Cyber Security Essentials Plus) without clear international equivalents or flexibility.
Clarity40/100
Product descriptions and eligibility requirements are generally clear. However, the 'Carbon' requirement is incomplete, and the link for 'acceptable alternatives' is mislabeled as 'Notified Bodies' while pointing to accreditation bodies, causing confusion.
•Incomplete 'Carbon' requirement.
•Misleading label 'Notified Bodies' for the IAF accreditation bodies link.
Completeness83/100
The tender is severely incomplete. Crucial information such as full tender documents, detailed specifications, evaluation criteria, contract terms, and submission instructions are entirely missing, making it impossible for bidders to prepare a comprehensive offer.
•Absence of full tender documents (e.g., specifications, terms and conditions, contract draft).
•Missing evaluation criteria.
Fairness60/100
While the open procedure and standard certifications promote fairness, the highly specific UK-centric sustainability and cyber security requirements could disproportionately disadvantage international suppliers, potentially limiting competition and favoring those already integrated into the UK public sector ecosystem.
•Specific UK-centric requirements (MSAT, Evergreen, PPN 006, Cyber Security Essentials Plus) may limit international competition and favor domestic suppliers.
Practicality40/100
The absence of full tender documents makes it impractical for any bidder to prepare a compliant and competitive offer. Meeting the specific UK-centric assessments (MSAT, Evergreen) within 12 months might also be challenging for new international entrants.
•Impractical to prepare a bid without full tender documents.
•Specific UK-centric assessments may pose practical challenges for international bidders.
Data Consistency100/100
There is an inconsistency in the provided text where the link for 'acceptable alternatives' is labeled 'Notified Bodies' but directs to the International Accreditation Forum (IAF) accreditation bodies.
•Inconsistency between the label 'Notified Bodies' and the content of the linked IAF accreditation bodies page.
Sustainability0/100
The tender demonstrates a strong commitment to sustainability and ethical supply chains through requirements like Modern Slavery Statements, MSAT, Evergreen Sustainable Supplier Assessment, and Carbon Reduction Plans. This is a significant strength.