Legal Compliance100/100
The open procedure is legally sound. However, the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements in the extract means bidders must consult the external portal for full legal compliance details.
•Lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided extract.
•Lack of explicit financial requirements in the provided extract.
Clarity40/100
The description of the three service offers and the requirement for a single provider is clear. However, the full scope of services and detailed requirements are not present in the extract, requiring external access for complete clarity.
•Full scope of services not directly available in the provided extract, requiring external portal access.
•Detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements not directly available in the provided extract.
Completeness83/100
The provided extract is significantly incomplete, lacking the full tender documents, mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and critically, evaluation criteria. This hinders a bidder's ability to prepare a comprehensive response.
•Missing full tender documents.
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds.
Fairness60/100
The requirement for a 'single provider' to deliver three distinct, albeit related, services could potentially limit competition, especially for specialized organizations. This might be perceived as tailoring if the market for integrated providers is narrow. The absence of evaluation criteria also impacts fairness.
•The 'single provider' requirement for three distinct services may unduly restrict competition and could be perceived as tailoring.
•Missing evaluation criteria.
Practicality40/100
While the integrated service model might offer administrative benefits to the Council, the lack of comprehensive documentation and evaluation criteria in the extract makes it impractical for bidders to fully assess the opportunity and prepare a competitive bid without extensive reliance on the external portal.
•Lack of full tender documents and evaluation criteria in the extract makes initial assessment and bid preparation impractical without external portal access.
Data Consistency100/100
The information provided within the extract is internally consistent. However, the automated check's 'No e-submission' contradicts the explicit instruction to submit via the www.the-chest.org.uk portal, which is an e-submission platform.
•Automated check's 'No e-submission' contradicts the tender's instruction to submit via an online portal (www.the-chest.org.uk).
Sustainability0/100
The tender extract does not include any explicit requirements or considerations related to green procurement, social criteria, or innovation, indicating a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability objectives.
•No explicit mention of green procurement.
•No explicit mention of social criteria.