Design and author supervision for the reconstruction of the Municipal Police building

This tender is generally clear in its scope but presents significant deficiencies in transparency and fairness, primarily due to restricted document access and the absence of evaluation criteria.

Legal compliance is moderately impacted by the 'Restricted document access' flag, which is a serious concern for transparency and equal treatment under procurement laws. While deadlines are reasonable and CPV codes are appropriate, this issue significantly lowers the score.

The tender's clarity is severely compromised by the 'Missing evaluation criteria'. Without clear criteria for how bids will be judged, bidders cannot effectively prepare their proposals, leading to ambiguity in the assessment process. Other descriptions are clear.

Completeness is hampered by the 'Estimated Value: Not disclosed' and, more critically, the 'Missing evaluation criteria'. While most basic information and documents are provided, these omissions represent significant gaps in essential tender information.

Fairness is significantly undermined by 'Restricted document access' and 'Missing evaluation criteria'. These issues prevent equal access to information and transparent assessment, creating an uneven playing field for potential bidders. The undisclosed value further reduces transparency.

Practicality is moderately affected by 'Restricted document access', which creates a barrier for bidders to prepare comprehensive proposals. While e-procurement is indicated (despite a minor contradiction in automated checks), the lack of full document access is a practical impediment.

Data consistency is generally good, with logical dates and no reported disputes. A minor inconsistency exists between 'E-Procurement' in characteristics and 'No e-submission' in automated checks, though 'Elektronisko iepirkumu sistēma' as opening place suggests e-submission is supported.

Sustainability aspects are largely absent. The tender does not explicitly include green procurement, social criteria, or an innovation focus. While it is EU funded, this does not automatically imply specific sustainability requirements within the tender itself.