Street lighting maintenance in Salaspils

This tender for street lighting maintenance in Salaspils exhibits significant deficiencies in transparency and fairness, primarily due to restricted document access, undisclosed estimated value, and the critical absence of evaluation criteria. While basic information and e-procurement are present, these fundamental flaws severely impact its quality and compliance.

The tender defines the procedure and CPV codes correctly, and the submission deadline is reasonable. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value, missing evaluation criteria, and especially the 'Restricted document access' are significant compliance issues, hindering transparency and equal treatment principles.

The tender's description and AI-extracted requirements are clear and well-structured, referencing specific documents for details. However, the explicit flag of 'No evaluation criteria specified' is a major deficiency, severely impacting the overall clarity for potential bidders. Restricted document access also prevents full assessment of clarity.

The tender provides most basic information, including key dates, organization, and a clear description. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and critically, evaluation criteria are missing. The 'Restricted document access' also means the tender is not fully complete from a bidder's perspective, as essential information is not readily available.

The tender suffers from severe fairness issues due to restricted document access, undisclosed estimated value, and the complete absence of evaluation criteria. While e-procurement is enabled and deadlines are reasonable, these fundamental flaws undermine the principles of transparency and equal treatment for all potential bidders.

Electronic submission is supported, which is practical. The duration is clearly specified. However, the lack of a known contract start date and undisclosed financing information (estimated value) reduce practicality for bidders in planning and resource allocation. The restricted document access also makes it impractical for bidders to access necessary information.

The tender data is largely consistent with logical dates and no reported disputes. The main inconsistency is the unpopulated estimated value field, which is flagged as 'Value not disclosed' despite 'Value Classified: No'. The discrepancy between 'E-Procurement' and the automated 'No e-submission' is noted but resolved by assuming e-procurement is indeed supported.

The tender does not appear to incorporate any specific green, social, or innovation-focused procurement criteria. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.